Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 406125 - dev-db/mariadb USE=oqgraph fails with newer boost
Summary: dev-db/mariadb USE=oqgraph fails with newer boost
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux MySQL bugs team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-02-28 10:26 UTC by Francesco Riosa
Modified: 2016-04-12 11:58 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Francesco Riosa 2012-02-28 10:26:05 UTC
see upstream bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/maria/+bug/906638

dev-util/boost-build-1.48 is avaiable now in gentoo breaking dev-db/mariadb with USE=oqgraph
Comment 1 Brian Evans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-04-17 16:29:30 UTC
There are new versions of MariaDB 5.2, 5.3 and 5.5 in the overlay.

The upstream bug is marked as released 2 months ago.

Please try again with the latest versions.
Comment 2 Brian Evans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-04-17 16:56:23 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> There are new versions of MariaDB 5.2, 5.3 and 5.5 in the overlay.
> 
> The upstream bug is marked as released 2 months ago.
> 
> Please try again with the latest versions.

Oops, it seems as if 5.5 may not be fixed, but 5.2 and 5.3 series should be
Comment 3 Brian Evans (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-02-06 05:02:11 UTC
Built with USE="oqgraph" on all of the latest MariaDB branches and Boost 1.4.9.

Time to close this bug.
Comment 4 Robin Johnson archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2013-02-06 09:21:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Built with USE="oqgraph" on all of the latest MariaDB branches and Boost
> 1.4.9.
> 
> Time to close this bug.


Thx Brian
Comment 5 Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) gentoo-dev 2016-04-12 11:58:19 UTC
Can I ask to reopen this bug, or should I report new one?
see: https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-9479