Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 401345 - net-libs/gnutls should leave the libraries from old version
Summary: net-libs/gnutls should leave the libraries from old version
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Crypto team [DISABLED]
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-01-29 16:22 UTC by Maciej Piechotka
Modified: 2012-11-04 05:24 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Maciej Piechotka 2012-01-29 16:22:32 UTC
As wget might depend on net-libs/gnutls update of the latter should leave old library in place to allow cave fix-linkage/revdep-rebuild.
Comment 1 Dane Smith (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-01-30 16:10:56 UTC
This issue has been fixed in portage-2.2*. Portage itself will keep needed libraries on the system until the revdeps have been rebuilt.As such, I don't think it's something we should be rehashing in a different way on a per package basis.
Comment 2 Maciej Piechotka 2012-01-30 21:04:28 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> This issue has been fixed in portage-2.2*. Portage itself will keep needed
> libraries on the system until the revdeps have been rebuilt.As such, I don't
> think it's something we should be rehashing in a different way on a per package
> basis.

Please note that portage is not the only package manager in Gentoo. Paludis don't do this and I don't know about pkgcore.
Comment 3 Maciej Piechotka 2012-02-01 22:00:15 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> This issue has been fixed in portage-2.2*. Portage itself will keep needed
> libraries on the system until the revdeps have been rebuilt.As such, I don't
> think it's something we should be rehashing in a different way on a per package
> basis.

I asked on the forum[1] and from what I understand >=portage-2.2 is masked and will not be unmasked soon. Furthermore it seems that PMS is not mandating that behaviour and therefore it may be broken with 3-rd party  PM.

[1] http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-911138-start-0-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-.html
Comment 4 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-11-04 05:24:40 UTC
Portage 2.1 got preserved-rebuild.