Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 398473 - [patch] sys-kernel/genkernel v86d support
Summary: [patch] sys-kernel/genkernel v86d support
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 193514
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Hosted Projects
Classification: Unclassified
Component: genkernel (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Genkernel Maintainers
Depends on:
Reported: 2012-01-11 04:32 UTC by Tomasz Wasiak
Modified: 2013-08-23 11:00 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

V86d support for genkernel (genkernel-,11.07 KB, patch)
2012-01-11 04:33 UTC, Tomasz Wasiak
Details | Diff
V86d support for genkernel. (genkernel-,11.86 KB, patch)
2012-01-12 04:47 UTC, Tomasz Wasiak
Details | Diff
V86d support for genkernel. (genkernel-,11.86 KB, patch)
2012-01-12 17:13 UTC, Tomasz Wasiak
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tomasz Wasiak 2012-01-11 04:32:45 UTC
I hope this patch could be included in genkernel. It builds klibc, stores it in bincache, do some magic with klcc when ${TEMP} changes... and then builds v86d using that klibc/klcc.

Applies to genkernel and 3.4.22-2-g8a91222

Reproducible: Always

Expected Results:  
uvesafb will now be supported by genkernel :-D
Comment 1 Tomasz Wasiak 2012-01-11 04:33:33 UTC
Created attachment 298593 [details, diff]
V86d support for genkernel

I hope this is "proper" patch for v86d support inclusion in genkernel...
Comment 2 Tomasz Wasiak 2012-01-12 04:47:41 UTC
Created attachment 298707 [details, diff]
V86d support for genkernel.

Small fixes to previous patch:
 - genkernel will check for klibc & v86d source tarballs
 - v86d will not be included if uvesafb is not compiled into kernel or as a module.
Comment 3 Tomasz Wasiak 2012-01-12 17:13:07 UTC
Created attachment 298773 [details, diff]
V86d support for genkernel.

Fix for previous patch
Comment 4 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2013-08-23 11:00:14 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 193514 ***