Is it OK to stabilize =net-nds/tac_plus-22.214.171.124-r2 ?
If so, please CC arches and add STABLEREQ keyword.
Stabilization of this package has been repoman-checked on the following arches: x86, amd64
Maintainer timeout (30 days). Arches please go ahead.
Apologies for missing this. Yes, I approve of stabilising this package. A compile test will suffice, as you would need Cisco equipment to fully exercise this package.
a Chainsaw package no less..
archtester tac_plus # emerge tac_plus
>>> Emerging (1 of 1) net-nds/tac_plus-126.96.36.199-r2
>>> Installing (1 of 1) net-nds/tac_plus-188.8.131.52-r2
amd64 looks good
scanelf shows sys-libs/pam among rdepend, please check it and add it if needed.
for everything else amd64 is ok
Arches, please compile test =net-nds/tac_plus-184.108.40.206-r3. This package addresses points raised in AMD64 testing, and as such I am presenting it to you without a 30 day delay.
amd64 ok. concur with Maurizio.
+ 07 Feb 2012; Tony Vroon <firstname.lastname@example.org> tac_plus-220.127.116.11-r3.ebuild:
+ Marked stable on AMD64 based on arch testing by Maurizio "k01" Camisaschi &
+ Aaron "B-Man" Bauman in bug #397187.
x86 stable, closing