attempting to emerge metadata-extractor-2.2.2-r2, aborts early on. Initially failed in amd64, testing for a different package, double checked in testing gentoo, same Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. emerge package 2. 3. Actual Results: [javac] [loading java/io/ObjectOutputStream.class(java/io:ObjectOutputStream.class)] [javac] [loading java/io/ObjectInputStream.class(java/io:ObjectInputStream.class)] [javac] [checking com.drew.metadata.test.MockDirectory] [javac] [total 2900ms] [javac] 3 errors [javac] 11 warnings BUILD FAILED and or [javac] JPEGDecodeParam.COMMENT_MARKER cannot be resolved [javac] ---------- [javac] 3 problems (3 errors) BUILD FAILED [javac] JPEGDecodeParam.COMMENT_MARKER cannot be resolved [javac] ---------- [javac] 3 problems (3 errors) BUILD FAILED Expected Results: effective emerge of a stable package strongest clues; idella@gentoo64 ~/bin $ sudo grep -i error /mnt/arch/root/run2/metadata-extractor-2.2.2-r2-build.log2 Password: [javac] 1. ERROR in /var/tmp/portage/portage/dev-java/metadata-extractor-2.2.2-r2/work/src/com/drew/imaging/jpeg/JpegMetadataReader.java (at line 80) [javac] 2. ERROR in /var/tmp/portage/portage/dev-java/metadata-extractor-2.2.2-r2/work/src/com/drew/imaging/jpeg/JpegMetadataReader.java (at line 86) [javac] 3. ERROR in /var/tmp/portage/portage/dev-java/metadata-extractor-2.2.2-r2/work/src/com/drew/imaging/jpeg/JpegMetadataReader.java (at line 94) [javac] 3 problems (3 errors) /var/tmp/portage/portage/dev-java/metadata-extractor-2.2.2-r2/work/build.xml:22: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details. * ERROR: dev-java/metadata-extractor-2.2.2-r2 failed (compile phase): /var/tmp/portage/portage/dev-java/metadata-extractor-2.2.2-r2/work/build.xml:22: Compile failed; see the compiler error output for details.
Created attachment 273969 [details] my emerge --info, stable
Created attachment 273971 [details] my emerge --info, testing
Are you hitting bug 297999?
Created attachment 273973 [details] the build log, tesing warning: setlocale: LC_ALL, ignore, has no impact
Created attachment 273975 [details] the build log, amd64
Created attachment 273977 [details] the build.xml, amd64
Created attachment 273983 [details] the build.xml stable, ~amd64
(In reply to comment #3) > Are you hitting bug 297999? looking at the build log, it seems so. That was quick. I did enter a search on the package name, but did not get that returned in the list. Still have the search in my cache.
(In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Are you hitting bug 297999? > > looking at the build log, it seems so. > That was quick. > Marking as duplicate then. In the future please don't attach build.xml files unless explicitly asked. In the common case attaching them only provides email noise. You should also make sure the files end up with proper mime types. Seems some logs are for example application/octet-stream instead of text/plain. Also there is no need to attach things for both stable and testing to one issue. If testing and stable exhibit different problems then two different bugs should be opened. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 297999 ***
ok, noted