Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 364495 - Please stabilize dev-java/icedtea-6.1.13.6
Summary: Please stabilize dev-java/icedtea-6.1.13.6
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement with 2 votes (vote)
Assignee: Andrew John Hughes
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
: 366425 366427 (view as bug list)
Depends on: 356991 380745 356645 380743 400691
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-04-22 16:15 UTC by charles17
Modified: 2015-04-01 07:23 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
circular deps (out,1.96 KB, text/plain)
2011-09-05 20:43 UTC, Tomáš "tpruzina" Pružina (amd64 [ex]AT)
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description charles17 2011-04-22 16:15:44 UTC
Please stabilize dev-java/icedtea-6.1.10.1 on amd64

All bugs that are still open in #247140 seem to be solved or are not relevant for amd64.
Comment 1 Vlastimil Babka (Caster) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-04-29 07:11:44 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> All bugs that are still open in #247140 seem to be solved or are not relevant
> for amd64.

Yeah but it would mean stabilizing also icedtea-web which has bug 363049.
Comment 2 Vlastimil Babka (Caster) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-08-25 18:34:01 UTC
It's time to bit the bullet.

Please stabilize per summary. I believe there's not much testing needed (e.g. emerging all java packages) at this point. Default USE flags are enough. Please don't enable cacao, jamvm, zero. Testing browser plugin (icedtea-web) can be done by selecting it with eselect java-nsplugin and then restarting e.g. firefox and googling for some applets.

In case of emerge dependency issues, emerge icedtea6-bin first for bootstrap.

I hope that's all, thanks.
Comment 3 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-09-02 09:56:20 UTC
amd64:

all emerges ok
Comment 4 Tomáš "tpruzina" Pružina (amd64 [ex]AT) 2011-09-05 20:43:14 UTC
Created attachment 285669 [details]
circular deps

I got circular deps problem in my (pretty much minimal) stable chroot. Cant tell more, haven't slept much lately. Ideas?
Comment 5 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-09-06 03:48:07 UTC
Tomas,

easy, simply emerge the jdk by itself first, that should be enough, if not the xalan by itself. Other will follow
Comment 6 Vlastimil Babka (Caster) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-09-06 09:28:10 UTC
Hm if emerging icedtea6-bin first didn't help with the circular deps, then emerging also virtual/jdk should. Please tell me if it's really the case, as that needs to be added to docs.
Comment 7 Vlastimil Babka (Caster) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-09-06 09:28:50 UTC
*** Bug 366427 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Tomáš "tpruzina" Pružina (amd64 [ex]AT) 2011-09-06 10:15:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Tomas,
> 
> easy, simply emerge the jdk by itself first, that should be enough, if not the
> xalan by itself. Other will follow

I had to emerge xalan first, simple "emerge =dev-java/icedtea-6.1.10.3" nor "dev-java/icedtea-web-1.1.1", didnt do. Then it emerged fine.
Comment 9 Vlastimil Babka (Caster) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-09-12 08:01:32 UTC
*** Bug 366425 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2011-09-16 11:58:40 UTC
Please re-add us when the blockers bugs are fixed. Thanks.
Comment 11 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2011-10-28 10:14:41 UTC
we move to 6.1.10.4 now, please clear old vulnerable version.
Comment 12 Vlastimil Babka (Caster) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-10-28 21:28:55 UTC
Gonna restate this a bit later after changing VMHANDLE.
Comment 13 Jens-Uwe Peter 2012-06-17 10:07:16 UTC
OK. No we are on 6.1.11.2. Can we stabilize this in the next weeks?
Comment 14 Daniel Bumke 2012-06-17 11:13:58 UTC
Given bug 421031 maybe a bump to 6.1.11.3 should be done first?
Comment 15 Jens-Uwe Peter 2012-06-20 14:20:17 UTC
So can we stabilize as 6.1.11.3 is in?
Comment 16 Stefan Kuhn 2012-07-27 18:37:03 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Created attachment 285669 [details]
> circular deps
> 
> I got circular deps problem in my (pretty much minimal) stable chroot. Cant
> tell more, haven't slept much lately. Ideas?

This is the same as in Bug 382421 .
I just had circular dependencies with ant-core, the same as in Bug #415139 but using icedtea-6.1.11.3.

From the comments in the other bugs "portage needs some assistance to get icedtea bootstrapped".
Comment 17 Daiajo Tibdixious 2013-08-07 22:51:00 UTC
USE="-nsplugin -webstart -jbootstrap -nss -alsa -source" emerge -avu icedtea
disables all but the X use flag, yet I still get:
(dev-java/icedtea-7.2.4.1::gentoo. ebuild scheduled for merge) depends on
 (dev_java/icedtea-7.2.4.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime)

which comes up as a circular dependency. How can a product depend on itself?

I have virtual/jdk & icedtea-bin installed.

This is a new system, but I have finished installing almost every other product, including KDE.
Comment 18 cyberbat 2013-08-08 14:07:26 UTC
(In reply to Daiajo Tibdixious from comment #17)
> USE="-nsplugin -webstart -jbootstrap -nss -alsa -source" emerge -avu icedtea
> disables all but the X use flag, yet I still get:
> (dev-java/icedtea-7.2.4.1::gentoo. ebuild scheduled for merge) depends on
>  (dev_java/icedtea-7.2.4.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (buildtime)
> 
> which comes up as a circular dependency. How can a product depend on itself?
> 
> I have virtual/jdk & icedtea-bin installed.
> 
> This is a new system, but I have finished installing almost every other
> product, including KDE.

Try to USE="jbootstrap"
Comment 19 Ralph Sennhauser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-10-25 15:43:08 UTC
Removing icedtea-web from this request as of version 1.4.0 icedtea-web supports switching JVM and therefore can be stabilized prior to icedtea.
Comment 20 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2014-02-08 12:49:34 UTC
Are bugs 356991 380745 then only ones blocking this?
Comment 21 Andrew John Hughes 2015-03-22 22:21:31 UTC
Updated summary to reflect current version of 6 in need of stabilisation.
Comment 22 Andrew John Hughes 2015-03-22 22:27:38 UTC
I'm not sure why 356991 & 380745 are blocking this. While I can see the case for allowing users to override the CFLAGS and LDFLAGS used, I can also see it leading to a lot of breakage if JDKs are suddenly being built with compiler flags that no-one has ever tested before.
Comment 23 charles17 2015-04-01 07:23:14 UTC
Obsoleted by Bug 483018 (1.6 JDKs/JREs cleanup).