new version available Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: update please) Actual Results: updated maybe I'm not there do request. Move please
why not put lazarus in Portage?
bump...
I copy ebuild of dev-lang/lazarus-0.9.28.2-r1 to dev-lang/lazarus-0.9.30.2 and make some small corrections.
Created attachment 299019 [details] dev-lang/lazarus-0.9.30.2.ebuild
I suppose, lazarus-0.9.28.2-bug0015627.patch is no longer needed. And I should make FPCVER="2.6.0" because of lazarus-0.9.30.2 doesn't compile with fpc-2.4.0.
We can't use FPCVER="2.6.0" because http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/pipermail/lazarus/2012-January/069672.html We should use FPCVER="2.4.4" instead FPCVER="2.6.0"
(In reply to comment #5) > I suppose, lazarus-0.9.28.2-bug0015627.patch is no longer needed. > That's right. I backported it form upstream to lazarus-0.9.28.2 because there are some problems with some dialogs and gtk2. The bug for this patch was https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333761 suilenroc1183
Lazarus 0.9.30.4 released on March 15, 2012. http://lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,16309.0.html With Lazarus 0.9.30.4 we should use FPCVER="2.6.0"
Just tested with 0.9.30.4 but without 0.9.26-fpcsrc.patch and it works or so it seams :) so can someone please "update" the official tree
0.9.30.4 was out 3 months ago, any chance this could make it into the tree? thx
http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/topic,18019.html?PHPSESSID=3343a5816c84d5920875e4b4b35e8d5d Lazarus 1.0 was released
*** Bug 446144 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
+ 31 Jan 2013; Patrick Lauer <patrick@gentoo.org> +lazarus-1.0.4.ebuild: + Bump for #364261
Please update ebuild-file of portage tree for lazarus-1.0.6 ( http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org ) that was released on 04 feb 2013
