Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 343677 - dev-texlive/texlive-context license change
Summary: dev-texlive/texlive-context license change
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Alexis Ballier
URL: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Read_Me
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-11-01 11:11 UTC by Matija "hook" Šuklje
Modified: 2010-11-06 23:23 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Matija "hook" Šuklje 2010-11-01 11:11:07 UTC
According to ConTeXt README on http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Read_Me the code is GPL-2 and the documentation is CC-NC-SA-2.5.

Did anyone check if dev-texlive/texlive-context has the appropriate license line?

It currently (in version 2010) reads:
LICENSE="GPL-2 as-is FDL-1.1 GPL-1 GPL-2 public-domain "
Comment 1 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2010-11-06 13:54:18 UTC
The license in the ebuild comes from what texlive provides... why do you _want_ someone to check the license when you didn't even bother to ?
Comment 2 Matija "hook" Šuklje 2010-11-06 15:34:10 UTC
I did. And I posted here what I found out. I'm just asking if anyone is more informed then what I found out in the official ConTeXt README.
Comment 3 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2010-11-06 21:51:44 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> I did. And I posted here what I found out. I'm just asking if anyone is more
> informed then what I found out in the official ConTeXt README.

texlive-context is context packaged for texlive, by texlive upstream. They take care of the license issues and remove these packages that come with an incompatible, they may add some other packages that they see fit well in the texlive-context (or any other) collection, so imho, context readme doesnt help much here; if you want to do a license review then you should review every single file that is provided by the ebuild.
Comment 4 Matija "hook" Šuklje 2010-11-06 23:23:29 UTC
OK, that makes sense.

Thanks for exaplaining :)