Bug 338113 – Stabilize sys-apps/sandbox-2.3-r1

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description SpanKY 2010-09-20 06:18:57 UTC]

no known regressions, but plenty of fixes over current stable

[Comment 1 Myckel Habets (work) 2010-09-21 16:29:31 UTC]

Builds fine on x86, build its rdeps, only hmake failing (but not due to the sandbox).

I guess it is ok to mark it stable for x86, but I think it is wise to use it a bit longer to build a few more (system) packages to see if problems surface.

[Comment 2 Myckel Habets (work) 2010-09-22 07:52:32 UTC]

(In reply to comment #1)
> Builds fine on x86, build its rdeps, only hmake failing (but not due to the
> sandbox).
> 
> I guess it is ok to mark it stable for x86, but I think it is wise to use it a
> bit longer to build a few more (system) packages to see if problems surface.
> 

I've started a rebuild (emerge --emptytree --keep-going system) of my system with this new sandbox. Hope to have it finished by this evening. 

[Comment 3 Myckel Habets 2010-09-22 20:32:53 UTC]

Looks good to go stable. Please mark stable for x86.

[Comment 4 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) 2010-09-24 19:39:43 UTC]

amd64 done

[Comment 5 David Abbott (RETIRED) 2010-09-24 20:35:02 UTC]

All good x86.

[Comment 6 Luca Lesinigo 2010-09-27 10:00:01 UTC]

sys-apps/sandbox-2.3-r1 fails emerging on profile hardened/linux/amd64/10.0/no-multilib with tests enabled.

The system is completely updated to currently stable ebuilds, and the sandbox test suite fails also with sandbox-2.3-r1 itself being installed in the system (eg., I upgraded sandbox with tests disabled and tried again with tests enabled), the failing test is script/8

FEATURES="sandbox test"  -> fail
FEATURES="-sandbox test" -> fail
FEATURES="sandbox -test" -> installs and runs fine (for example, fixes bug #293758)

the same thing happens both with gcc x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.3.4 and x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.3.4-vanilla profiles.

[Comment 7 SpanKY 2010-09-27 17:59:24 UTC]

you do not report problems to stable bugs.  you file a new one and mark it a blocker.  you could then at least include real details.

[Comment 8 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2010-09-29 16:16:28 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 9 Markus Meier 2010-10-05 20:00:51 UTC]

x86 stable, thanks Myckel

[Comment 10 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2010-10-10 18:27:44 UTC]

alpha/arm/ia64/m68k/s390/sh stable

[Comment 11 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2010-10-10 20:00:07 UTC]

ppc64 stable, one test failed (but because it was my own fault, didn't set localtime on chroot), then built 100+ system pkgs with it no problems

[Comment 12 Brent Baude (RETIRED) 2010-10-16 14:09:02 UTC]

ppc stable, closing

[Comment 13 SpanKY 2010-11-23 02:55:14 UTC]

sparc should be usable with this version since ptrace has been disabled for it

[Comment 14 Alex Buell 2010-11-26 08:49:33 UTC]

Tested on SPARC, passes its tests. Tested building a real package with it. Stabilisation should be OK. 

[Comment 15 Michael Weber (RETIRED) 2010-11-30 16:27:34 UTC]

sparc done, closing