different warnings but still in the ~amd64 tree at least QA: other │ │QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile │ │ fine but exhibit random runtime failures. │ │exp_main_sub.c:306: warning: implicit declaration of function │ │'exp_tty_cooked_echo' exp_trap.c:286: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strcmp' │ │exp_trap.c:411: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strlen' │ │exp_trap.c:413: warning: implicit declaration of function 'memcpy' │ │exp_trap.c:488: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strncmp' │ │exp_clib.c:2283: warning: implicit declaration of function 'setpgrp' │ │exp_clib.c:2314: warning: implicit declaration of function 'exp_init_tty' │ │exp_clib.c:2354: warning: implicit declaration of function 'pipe' │ │exp_clib.c:2358: warning: implicit declaration of function 'close' exp_clib.c:2371: warning: implicit declaration of function 'fork' │ │exp_clib.c:2411: warning: implicit declaration of function 'read' │ │exp_clib.c:2425: warning: implicit declaration of function 'write' │ │exp_clib.c:2452: warning: implicit declaration of function 'waitpid' │ │exp_clib.c:2483: warning: implicit declaration of function 'setsid' │ │exp_clib.c:2679: warning: implicit declaration of function 'execvp' │ │exp_clib.c:2795: warning: implicit declaration of function 'alarm' │ │exp_chan.c:610: warning: implicit declaration of function 'exp_background_channelhandler' │ │pty_termios.c:470: warning: implicit declaration of function 'openpty' │ │pty_termios.c:475: warning: implicit declaration of function 'strcpy' │ │pty_termios.c:641: warning: implicit declaration of function 'expErrnoMsg' │ │QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile │ │ fine but exhibit random runtime failures. │ │exp_trap.c:411: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in │ │function 'strlen' exp_trap.c:413: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in │ │function 'memcpy' │ │pty_termios.c:475: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in │ │function 'strcpy' │ │Please do not file a Gentoo bug and instead report the above QA │ │issues directly to the upstream developers of this software. │ │Homepage: http://expect.nist.gov/ Reproducible: Always Portage 2.1.9.7 (default/linux/amd64/10.0, gcc-4.4.4, glibc-2.12.1-r1, 2.6.35-gentoo-r6 x86_64) ================================================================= System uname: Linux-2.6.35-gentoo-r6-x86_64-AMD_Athlon-tm-_64_Processor_3200+-with-gentoo-2.0.1 Timestamp of tree: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 21:00:22 +0000 app-shells/bash: 4.1_p7 dev-java/java-config: 2.1.11 dev-lang/python: 2.6.5-r3, 3.1.2-r4 dev-util/cmake: 2.8.1-r2 sys-apps/baselayout: 2.0.1 sys-apps/openrc: 0.6.3 sys-apps/sandbox: 2.3-r1 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.67 sys-devel/automake: 1.10.3, 1.11.1 sys-devel/binutils: 2.20.1-r1 sys-devel/gcc: 4.4.4-r2 sys-devel/gcc-config: 1.4.1 sys-devel/libtool: 2.2.10 sys-devel/make: 3.81-r2 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.35 (sys-kernel/linux-headers) ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64 ~amd64" ACCEPT_LICENSE="*" CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /etc/portage/ /usr/share/X11/xkb" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/ca-certificates.conf /etc/env.d /etc/env.d/java/ /etc/fonts/fonts.conf /etc/gconf /etc/gentoo-release /etc/revdep-rebuild /etc/sandbox.d /etc/terminfo" CXXFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="assume-digests buildpkg collision-protect distlocks fixlafiles fixpackages multilib-strict news parallel-fetch protect-owned sandbox sfperms strict test unknown-features-warn unmerge-logs unmerge-orphans userfetch" GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://ftp.gtlib.gatech.edu/pub/gentoo/ ftp://gentoo.chem.wisc.edu/gentoo/ http://mirrors.163.com/gentoo/ ftp://mirror.bih.net.ba/gentoo/" LANG="en_US.UTF-8" LDFLAGS="-Wl,--hash-style=gnu,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed" LINGUAS="en_US" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT="/" PORTAGE_RSYNC_OPTS="--recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times --compress --force --whole-file --delete --stats --timeout=180 --exclude=/distfiles --exclude=/local --exclude=/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" PORTDIR_OVERLAY=" " SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" USE="acl alsa amd64 berkdb bzip2 cdr cli cracklib crypt cups cxx dri en fortran gdbm gpm gtk iconv ipv6 midi mmx modules mudflap multilib ncurses nls nptl nptlonly openmp pam pcre perl pic pppd python readline reflection session sse sse2 ssl sysfs tcpd threads unicode xorg zlib" ALSA_CARDS="ali5451 als4000 atiixp atiixp-modem bt87x ca0106 cmipci emu10k1x ens1370 ens1371 es1938 es1968 fm801 hda-intel intel8x0 intel8x0m maestro3 trident usb-audio via82xx via82xx-modem ymfpci" ALSA_PCM_PLUGINS="adpcm alaw asym copy dmix dshare dsnoop empty extplug file hooks iec958 ioplug ladspa lfloat linear meter mmap_emul mulaw multi null plug rate route share shm softvol" APACHE2_MODULES="actions alias auth_basic authn_alias authn_anon authn_dbm authn_default authn_file authz_dbm authz_default authz_groupfile authz_host authz_owner authz_user autoindex cache cgi cgid dav dav_fs dav_lock deflate dir disk_cache env expires ext_filter file_cache filter headers include info log_config logio mem_cache mime mime_magic negotiation rewrite setenvif speling status unique_id userdir usertrack vhost_alias" ELIBC="glibc" INPUT_DEVICES="evdev keyboard mouse" KERNEL="linux" LCD_DEVICES="bayrad cfontz cfontz633 glk hd44780 lb216 lcdm001 mtxorb ncurses text" LINGUAS="en_US" RUBY_TARGETS="ruby18" USERLAND="GNU" VIDEO_CARDS="nv nvidia vesa" XTABLES_ADDONS="quota2 psd pknock lscan length2 ipv4options ipset ipp2p iface geoip fuzzy condition tee tarpit sysrq steal rawnat logmark ipmark dhcpmac delude chaos account" Unset: CPPFLAGS, CTARGET, EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, FFLAGS, INSTALL_MASK, LC_ALL, MAKEOPTS, PORTAGE_BUNZIP2_COMMAND, PORTAGE_COMPRESS, PORTAGE_COMPRESS_FLAGS, PORTAGE_RSYNC_EXTRA_OPTS
Created attachment 247862 [details] build.log
link mailed to webmaster
Quoting your build.log: Please do not file a Gentoo bug and instead report the above QA issues directly to the upstream developers of this software. Homepage: http://expect.nist.gov/
I'm sorry - I thought Gentoo would want to run QA on any package installed by portage. WONTFIX to me should reflect an upstream stance about software and we should not close for this with QA issues. If you as a developer see the issues as trivial though and note it I would perhaps reconsider. Otherwise how would we be able to say anything of the security of a Gentoo system?
(In reply to comment #4) > I'm sorry - I thought Gentoo would want to run QA on any package installed > by portage. WONTFIX to me should reflect an upstream stance about software > and we should not close for this with QA issues. If you as a developer see the > issues as trivial though and note it I would perhaps reconsider. > > Otherwise how would we be able to say anything of the security of a Gentoo > system? > You are right, but gentoo QA project says this is an upstream thing. Nevertheless, if you provide a patch, I will include it directly. But I will not write/fix it myself. @QA Was this handled correctly?
here's a better idea: write the patch, add it to the ebuild, and submit it upstream. how hard exactly is it to add "#include" to a few files ?
seems to be fixed for me now http://sources.gentoo.org/dev-tcltk/expect/expect-5.44.1.15.ebuild?r1=1.13&r2=1.14 http://sources.gentoo.org/dev-tcltk/expect/files/expect-5.44.1.15-headers.patch?rev=1.1
confirm- qa issues no longer reported by build process
Created attachment 320442 [details] build output I'm reopening bug because QA notices resurfaced (amd64,stable toolchain).
