Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 335103 - portage trying to merge package no longer in tree
Summary: portage trying to merge package no longer in tree
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 310947
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Core (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Portage team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-08-29 05:08 UTC by Tiago Marques
Modified: 2010-08-29 05:18 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tiago Marques 2010-08-29 05:08:30 UTC 
I have these packages installed:

 * installed packages
[I--] [  ] app-text/poppler-data-0.2.1 (0)
[I--] [M ] app-text/poppler-utils-0.10.7 (0)
[I--] [M ] dev-libs/poppler-0.10.7 (0)
[I--] [M ] dev-libs/poppler-glib-0.10.7 (0)
[I--] [  ] dev-libs/poppler-qt3-0.10.7 (0)
[I--] [M ] dev-libs/poppler-qt4-0.10.7 (0)
[I--] [M ] virtual/poppler-0.10.7 (0)
[I--] [M ] virtual/poppler-glib-0.10.7 (0)
[I--] [  ] virtual/poppler-qt3-0.10.7 (0)
[I--] [M ] virtual/poppler-qt4-0.10.7 (0)
[I--] [M ] virtual/poppler-utils-0.10.7 (0)

An update brought a change to app-text/poppler where I should stick the qt3 flag. The problem is that "emerge poppler -pv" results in the following:

emerge poppler -pv

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!

emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "dev-libs/poppler".
.................................................................

Which is not correct. "emerge app-text/poppler" works ok, but this isn't trivial and it only works for me because I'm used to portage's details.

I have not updated any package yet and would love to test an update portage against my installation.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2010-08-29 05:13:37 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 310947 ***
Comment 2 Tiago Marques 2010-08-29 05:18:51 UTC 
Sorry for the duplicate and thanks for the CC in the proper bug.