Tntnet suite was outdatet and incomplete. Attached (slightly modified) ebuilds are working well on x86 and amd86 architecture.
Created attachment 241613 [details] updated tntnet ebuild
Created attachment 241615 [details] updated cxxtools ebuild
Created attachment 241617 [details] new tntdb ebuild (for completing tntnet-suite)
tntdb is maint-wanted, @media-tv r u interested?
some words about this bump request, i have always a closer look on this bug ;) in fact, cxxtools, tntnet is only used from media-plugins/vdr-live on my local tests, vdr-live.0.2.0 will not compile with the cxxtools-2.0/tntnet-2.0 i have also tested snapshots of vdr-live, (latest from Dec 2010) it works good on compile, have any small bugs in the osd then, what will i do? 1. stabilize latest cxxtools, tntnet, vdr-live on x86/amd64 2. add cxxtools-2.0, tntnet-2.0 in portage ( hardmasked ) hardmasked why? it will breaks the vdr-live-0.2.0 install; if an user will play with this packages, he can unmasked local 3. contakt the maintainer of vdr-live, ask for to fix the small problems 4. ( if it fixed ) take a new snapshot of vdr-live, add it to the tree, unmask the hardmasked cxxtools, tntnet. comments on tntdb, read on the depended bug #181641
(In reply to comment #5) > what will i do? > 1. stabilize latest cxxtools, tntnet, vdr-live on x86/amd64 > 2. add cxxtools-2.0, tntnet-2.0 in portage ( hardmasked ) > hardmasked why? it will breaks the vdr-live-0.2.0 install; if an user will > play with this packages, he can unmasked local > 3. contakt the maintainer of vdr-live, ask for to fix the small problems > 4. ( if it fixed ) take a new snapshot of vdr-live, add it to the tree, unmask > the hardmasked cxxtools, tntnet. 1. done 2. done 3. done
(In reply to comment #5) > what will i do? > 4. ( if it fixed ) take a new snapshot of vdr-live, add it to the tree, unmask > the hardmasked cxxtools, tntnet. 4. done have fun...
Oh, sorry Oliver, I have vergotten the credits for your work, thanks for your work ;)