Been in the tree since 30 November 2009. There is one bug filed against it, but it's of such low quality that it deserves to be closed. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce:
X11 team, ok with adding arches?
There are some regressions in comparsion to 2.4... Are they fixed?
And at least bug #298337 should be fixed.
Could someone else pleeeeaaase look at that bug #298337 and confirm my suspicion that it's invalid.
Tomáš, could you expand on the regressions that you mentioned?
So, the only bug that this depended on has been closed, but there are no further details on the rumoured regressions...?
Can the arch testing teams be added to this? Can I do this myself or should the maintainer?
@arches, please stabilize 2.6.0, this version has been in ~arch for a looong time with only one (invalid) bug report. Thanks
x86 OK.
Stable on alpha.
Stable for HPPA.
ppc64 stable
Builds fine on x86. Rdeps build and run fine. Please mark stable for x86.
amd64/x86 stable, thanks Jeremy and Myckel
arm stable
ppc done
Tested as OK on SPARC64, please stabilise. glxgears appears to run OK.
ia64/sh/sparc stable, closing