Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 324865 - Rename Chromium to Chrome and add Google's branding
Summary: Rename Chromium to Chrome and add Google's branding
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 272805
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-06-20 19:03 UTC by Tiago Marques
Modified: 2010-06-20 21:29 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Chrome icons (Chrome Logos.tar.bz2,94.96 KB, application/octet-stream)
2010-06-20 19:04 UTC, Tiago Marques
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Tiago Marques 2010-06-20 19:03:39 UTC
Hi,

Is it possible that the stable Chromium builds be moved to an ebuild called "chrome", with the same icons as Chrome? Similarly to what already happens with Firefox.
I'm adding the icon pack from Google's as an attachment.
Thanks for looking at this.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Tiago Marques 2010-06-20 19:04:09 UTC
Created attachment 236093 [details]
Chrome icons
Comment 2 Gef 2010-06-20 19:12:51 UTC
?
Chromium is open-source, Chrome is not. I may also not understand properly your proposal.
Comment 3 Harald van Dijk (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-06-20 19:23:48 UTC
There are more differences between chromium and chrome than just the icons; the only way that chrome can be added is by using the Google-provided binary .deb or .rpm files. This would be a new package, and not an adaption of the existing chromium ebuild, and there's already a request for that.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 272805 ***
Comment 4 Tiago Marques 2010-06-20 19:29:21 UTC
I see. Thanks.
Sorry for submitting it.
Best regards
Comment 5 Tiago Marques 2010-06-20 19:40:52 UTC
Sorry to be bothering you again but just noted the executable for Chromium build is "chrome". Does Google really have such a distinction between Chromium and Chrome and wouldn't it be better to have both the bin and non-bin versions named "Chrome"? It does simplify looking for the ebuild and IMHO Chromium only made much sense when it wasn't ported fully to Linux.
Please think about this, if you think it's feasible.

Best regards
Comment 6 Gef 2010-06-20 19:51:07 UTC
There are 2 different softwares :
A) Google Chrome, closed source, available from google website: http://www.google.com/chrome?hl=en
B) Chromium, that is an open source version of Chrome
BUT these two have many differences, read [1]. Clearly, A != B

For ease of installation on smaller systems, Gentoo provides a third option:
C) ebuilds for a -bin version of B), which is nothing more than the builds of snapshots of the code produced available at [2] (and a few other things, like not using all shipped libs). Relation between B) and C) is pretty much the same as between www-clients/mozilla-firefox and www-clients/firefox-bin, AFAIK.

Status:
A) Not in portage: you will find ebuilds fot it in bug #324865
B) in portage: www-clients/chromium
C) in portage: www-clients/chromium-bin


[1] http://blog.chromium.org/2008/10/google-chrome-chromium-and-google.html
[2] http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/
Comment 7 Tiago Marques 2010-06-20 21:29:45 UTC
I see, thank you for explaining it. I searched before posting but hadn't found anything useful, only the mentions to RLZ and little else.
Thanks again.

Best regards,
Tiago