Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 323491 - Filezilla 3.3.0.1 missing libjpeg.so.62
Summary: Filezilla 3.3.0.1 missing libjpeg.so.62
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-06-10 21:51 UTC by behd
Modified: 2010-06-11 18:08 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description behd 2010-06-10 21:51:33 UTC
~ $ filezilla 
filezilla: error while loading shared libraries: libjpeg.so.62: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Reproducible: Always

Actual Results:  
 ~ $ filezilla 
filezilla: error while loading shared libraries: libjpeg.so.62: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory


Expected Results:  
filezilla client with gui ^^

I know that you hate that, but:

ln -s /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8.0.1 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.62

works as temporary workaround
Comment 1 Gef 2010-06-10 22:23:50 UTC
You can also rebuild filezilla to use newer installed libjpeg can't you ? or use revdep-rebuild (or FEATURES="preserved-rebuild" if you run ~arch).

Probably INVALID.
Comment 2 Michael Weber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-06-11 14:05:45 UTC
Libjpeg was updated some time ago.
Please run a `revdep-rebuild --ignore` from media-gfx/bootsplash-themes.
This should rebuild net-ftp/filezilla, report back if this doesn't happen.

Michael
Comment 3 behd 2010-06-11 18:08:54 UTC
@Gef it was a brand new emerge of filezilla (after a -C, I must say)
and I have only one instance of jpeg lib installed (8a)
rebuild (remerge) doesn't help (at least "as-is")

@both revdep-rebuild only complains about openoffice

For me case can be closed if you feel that it's only related to my very old system (maybe suffered too much profile update :) Anyway I can live with a symlink in my lib, was just FYI...