Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 312489 (CVE-2010-1192) - <net-libs/libesmtp-1.0.6: X.509 ASCII NUL spoofing (CVE-2010-{1192,1194})
Summary: <net-libs/libesmtp-1.0.6: X.509 ASCII NUL spoofing (CVE-2010-{1192,1194})
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: CVE-2010-1192
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High minor (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL:
Whiteboard: B3 [noglsa]
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-03-31 19:44 UTC by Alex Legler (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-11-21 16:43 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alex Legler (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2010-03-31 19:44:47 UTC
CVE-2010-1192 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-1192):
  libESMTP, probably 1.0.4 and earlier, does not properly handle a '\0'
  character in a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of
  an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to
  spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a
  legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.
Comment 1 Alex Legler (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2010-03-31 19:46:38 UTC
CVE-2010-1194 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-1194):
  The match_component function in smtp-tls.c in libESMTP 1.0.3.r1, and
  possibly other versions including 1.0.4, treats two strings as equal
  if one is a substring of the other, which allows remote attackers to
  spoof trusted certificates via a crafted subjectAltName.

Comment 2 Tim Harder gentoo-dev 2010-09-25 03:18:11 UTC
I think these problems are fixed in libesmtp-1.0.6 which I just added to the tree.
Comment 3 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-09-28 10:29:46 UTC
Test & stabilize:

=net-libs/libesmtp-1.0.6

Comment 4 Andreas Schürch gentoo-dev 2010-09-29 06:31:50 UTC
Tests passed successful here on x86.
Comment 5 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-02 15:05:20 UTC
Stable on alpha.
Comment 6 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-03 17:16:01 UTC
amd64 done
Comment 7 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2010-10-05 19:08:41 UTC
x86 stable, thanks Andreas
Comment 8 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-09 16:34:46 UTC
ia64/sparc stable
Comment 9 Brent Baude (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-15 12:57:41 UTC
ppc done
Comment 10 Tim Sammut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-11-20 16:53:27 UTC
GLSA Vote: no.
Comment 11 Stefan Behte (RETIRED) gentoo-dev Security 2010-11-21 16:43:15 UTC
Vote: NO. Barely used. Feel free to reopen, if you think otherwise.