Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 310697 - gnome-extra/gnome-web-photo-0.9 fails to build
Summary: gnome-extra/gnome-web-photo-0.9 fails to build
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Markos Chandras (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 302033
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-03-22 13:14 UTC by Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-03-24 13:39 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
build.log (build.log,38.89 KB, text/plain)
2010-03-22 13:14 UTC, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED)
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-22 13:14:06 UTC
gnome-web-photo-0.8-r1 fails too.

Writer.cpp:200: error: 'RENDER_IGNORE_VIEWPORT_SCROLLING' is not a member of 'nsIPresShell'

Will attach the full build log.
Comment 1 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-22 13:14:48 UTC
Created attachment 224673 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2010-03-22 13:48:20 UTC
src_prepare() {
        gnome2_src_prepare

        # Compatibility with xulrunner-1.9.2, per bug #303897
        epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PN}-0.8-libxul-compat.patch"

        eautoreconf
}

Maybe that patch is making it incompatible with xulrunner-1.9.1, that you seem to be using
Comment 3 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-22 13:50:42 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Maybe that patch is making it incompatible with xulrunner-1.9.1, that you seem
> to be using

Sounds likely, I'm using 1.9.1.8, latest stable on x86.
Comment 4 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-24 13:39:25 UTC
+  24 Mar 2010; Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@gentoo.org>
+  gnome-web-photo-0.8-r1.ebuild, gnome-web-photo-0.9.ebuild:
+  Fix incorrect xulrunner dependency, bug #310697.

Looks like the patch are not backward compatible. Fixed the dependencies,
thanks for reporting.