Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 309459 - Removal of dev-java/kaffe
Summary: Removal of dev-java/kaffe
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Java (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Java team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 148607 152536 163801 193504 214605 231198 249956 276093 279793 284399 297805
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-03-15 08:11 UTC by Alistair Bush (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-04-23 10:57 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alistair Bush (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-15 08:11:36 UTC
kaffe is old and unmaintaned.  Therefore it will be removed from the main tree and placed in java's junkyard overlay.
Comment 1 Alistair Bush (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-15 08:31:44 UTC
No ebuilds in java overlays

Will be moved to java junkyard so we better do it.

CCing treecleaners so they can write the obitatory or organise the minute of silence.
Comment 2 Andrew John Hughes 2010-03-15 14:58:27 UTC
The version in Gentoo was never even updated to the latest 1.19 http://kaffe.org/
Comment 3 Vlastimil Babka (Caster) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-15 15:18:57 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> The version in Gentoo was never even updated to the latest 1.19
> http://kaffe.org/
 
That's true, but the version is now 2 years old anyway. So what's the upstream status if you know?
Comment 4 Alistair Bush (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-15 18:00:23 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > The version in Gentoo was never even updated to the latest 1.19
> > http://kaffe.org/
> 
> That's true, but the version is now 2 years old anyway. So what's the upstream
> status if you know?
> 

Which is a pretty could indication of how unmaintained kaffe is.  Wouldn't it be better to put icedtea into the main tree and sped our time maintaining that.
Comment 5 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-15 21:58:31 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> 
> Which is a pretty could indication of how unmaintained kaffe is.  Wouldn't it
> be better to put icedtea into the main tree and sped our time maintaining that.
> 

You didn't notice that Caster already did :)
Comment 6 Alistair Bush (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-03-16 08:12:12 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> 
> You didn't notice that Caster already did :)
> 

Only once I made the comment :)   but the point about maintaining it still stands :)
Comment 7 Vlastimil Babka (Caster) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-04-23 10:57:32 UTC
Removed.