Bug 308035 – net-dns/bind: multiple regressions, potential cache poisoning (CVE-2010-{0290,0382})

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Security

[Description Stefan Behte (RETIRED) 2010-03-06 15:22:17 UTC]

CVE-2010-0290 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-0290):
  Unspecified vulnerability in ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before
  9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta,
  with DNSSEC validation enabled and checking disabled (CD), allows
  remote attackers to conduct DNS cache poisoning attacks by receiving
  a recursive client query and sending a response that contains (1)
  CNAME or (2) DNAME records, which do not have the intended validation
  before caching, aka Bug 20737.  NOTE: this vulnerability exists
  because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2009-4022.

[Comment 1 Stefan Behte (RETIRED) 2010-03-06 15:47:53 UTC]

CVE-2010-0382 (http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2010-0382):
  ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before
  9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta handles
  out-of-bailiwick data accompanying a secure response without
  re-fetching from the original source, which allows remote attackers
  to have an unspecified impact via a crafted response, aka Bug 20819. 
  NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of a regression during the
  fix for CVE-2009-4022.

[Comment 2 Stefan Behte (RETIRED) 2010-03-29 22:15:20 UTC]

ping, bind-herd!

[Comment 3 Christian Ruppert (idl0r) 2010-03-30 13:27:16 UTC]

bind-9.4.3_p4 has been removed, bind-9.4.3_p5 (stable) and bind-9.6.1_p3 are already in tree.

[Comment 4 Matthias Geerdsen (RETIRED) 2010-05-27 18:22:36 UTC]

going right to glsa status instead of glsa? since it is already drafted

[Comment 5 Alex Legler (RETIRED) 2010-06-02 21:24:29 UTC]

GLSA 201006-11