Bug 301135 – net-p2p/frostwire version bump to 4.18.6

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description John Dough 2010-01-15 20:43:57 UTC]

Please update net-p2p/frostwire to version 4.18.6

Reproducible: Always


Reproducible: Always

[Comment 1 dE 2010-07-08 16:20:23 UTC]

Created attachment 238039 [details]
New frostwire ebuild

[Comment 2 dE 2010-07-09 15:37:27 UTC]

Comment on attachment 238039 [details]
New frostwire ebuild

Fixing the issue again.

[Comment 3 dE 2010-07-09 15:38:21 UTC]

Created attachment 238131 [details]
Optional stuff fixed.

[Comment 4 John Dough 2010-08-07 22:30:54 UTC]

OK Frostwire is up to version 4.20.7 and I posted this 7 months ago so if possible can we get this updated.

[Comment 5 dE 2010-08-12 07:57:10 UTC]

I'll soon update the version to .8...

[Comment 6 dE 2010-08-13 07:01:55 UTC]

Created attachment 242715 [details]
Updated.

[Comment 7 Borkenkaefer 2010-08-29 12:24:34 UTC]

Created attachment 245215 [details]
Updated & fixed ebuild (versionator)

Version 4.20.9 is out!

[Comment 8 dE 2010-08-29 15:40:15 UTC]

Can someone place this in portage tree? Maybe mailing the p2p guys will help.

[Comment 9 Stanislav Ochotnicky (RETIRED) 2010-08-30 17:16:28 UTC]

(In reply to comment #8)
> Can someone place this in portage tree? Maybe mailing the p2p guys will help.
> 

No need to, we get every change to bugzilla over email anyway. I am working on this now, but FYI this is not binary package so I won't use your ebuild at all. 

[Comment 10 Stanislav Ochotnicky (RETIRED) 2010-08-30 17:41:46 UTC]

(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Can someone place this in portage tree? Maybe mailing the p2p guys will help.
> > 
> 
> No need to, we get every change to bugzilla over email anyway. I am working on
> this now, but FYI this is not binary package so I won't use your ebuild at all. 
> 

Alas it seems upstream stopped producing source tarball, so this package will turn into binary in the end it seems

[Comment 11 Stanislav Ochotnicky (RETIRED) 2010-08-30 20:55:49 UTC]

Bah, ugly java bundled libraries. Oh well...ebuild is in CVS now, should hit mirrors in a few hours. If you have problems with new version. file new bugs. And thanks for patience.

[Comment 12 Borkenkaefer 2010-08-31 10:11:23 UTC]

(In reply to comment #11)
> Bah, ugly java bundled libraries. 
>
ebuild in portage fails to emerge, because the dependency dev-java/commons-codec is missing in ebuild.

[Comment 13 dE 2010-08-31 13:40:27 UTC]

We  need a java ebuild for this with gcj.(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to comment #8)
> > > Can someone place this in portage tree? Maybe mailing the p2p guys will help.
> > > 
> > 
> > No need to, we get every change to bugzilla over email anyway. I am working on
> > this now, but FYI this is not binary package so I won't use your ebuild at all. 
> > 
> 
> Alas it seems upstream stopped producing source tarball, so this package will
> turn into binary in the end it seems
> 

Jdownloader style? GPL but we-don't-have-the-sources?

[Comment 14 Stanislav Ochotnicky (RETIRED) 2010-08-31 20:12:18 UTC]

(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > Bah, ugly java bundled libraries. 
> >
> ebuild in portage fails to emerge, because the dependency
> dev-java/commons-codec is missing in ebuild.
> 

Ah, sorry about that. I forgot to clean the chroot before final testing. Should be fixed in CVS now. Thank you for reporting this.

(In reply to comment #13)
> Jdownloader style? GPL but we-don't-have-the-sources?

Fortunately no, they just don't provide tarballs. Source is on Sourceforge. Some time ago there was someone trying to convince them to release source tarballs. I guess it didn't work out then, but I can try again...