The next version bump of app-admin/eselect is pending. However, I've noticed that several of its dependencies are missing keywords (which used not to be the case). Please (re-)keyword eselect's dependencies, or add them to package.provided or package.use.mask of your profile, whatever is appropriate. I'll bump eselect in about a week from now, but I thought I'll give you an advance warning before dropping keywords. Summary what should be keyworded / package.provided / package.use.masked: dev-python/docutils: m68k, mips, ppc-aix, x86-freebsd, hppa-hpux, ia64-hpux, x86-interix, ia64-linux, m68k-mint, sparc64-solaris, x64-solaris sys-apps/coreutils, sys-apps/file, sys-apps/sed, sys-libs/ncurses: ppc-aix, x86-freebsd, hppa-hpux, ia64-hpux, x86-interix, amd64-linux, ia64-linux, x86-linux, ppc-macos, x64-macos, x86-macos, m68k-mint, sparc-solaris, sparc64-solaris, x64-solaris x86-solaris
Created attachment 208415 [details] Output of "repoman -d"
Ulrich, The prefix team hears your concern but now we are in between a rock and a hard place. We really want to migrate more stuff but at the same time we are trying to be *more* friendly with other maintainers. Can repoman -d be ignored for some time yet? Future migrations will have proper deps in one tree instead of only caring about the destination tree (prefix).
(In reply to comment #2) > Ulrich, > > The prefix team hears your concern but now we are in between a rock and a hard > place. We really want to migrate more stuff but at the same time we are trying > to be *more* friendly with other maintainers. > > Can repoman -d be ignored for some time yet? Future migrations will have proper > deps in one tree instead of only caring about the destination tree (prefix). > Previous comment was sent to no one. Bugzilla deployment bug. =/ sigh.
prefix profiles are 'exp' now
prefix keywords added, thanks
docutils has been keyworded ~mips as part of bug 281161, don't see we had anything specific to this bug for us here, removing CC
Two years... closing as obsolete.
