Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 28301 - New ebuild: dia-newcanvas-0.6.10
Summary: New ebuild: dia-newcanvas-0.6.10
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
Keywords: EBUILD
Depends on:
Blocks: 28305
  Show dependency tree
Reported: 2003-09-09 14:51 UTC by David Grant
Modified: 2004-12-20 21:41 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

dia-newcanvas-0.6.10.ebuild (dia-newcanvas-0.6.10.ebuild,627 bytes, text/plain)
2003-09-09 15:14 UTC, David Grant
dia-newcanvas new ebuild (dia-newcanvas-0.6.10.ebuild,649 bytes, text/plain)
2003-11-25 13:23 UTC, David Grant
dia-newcanvas-0.6.10.ebuild (dia-newcanvas-0.6.10.ebuild,536 bytes, text/plain)
2003-12-03 13:56 UTC, David Grant
dia-newcanvas-0.6.10.ebuild (dia-newcanvas-0.6.10.ebuild,491 bytes, text/plain)
2003-12-03 13:58 UTC, David Grant

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description David Grant 2003-09-09 14:51:34 UTC

Dia-newcanvas is a gtk+2 vectorial widget that has got extra features as
compared to gnome canvas.

    * Split data/view done throught a renderer interface
    * Grid
    * Connections, attracted/attraction points
    * Gdk renderer (gnome-print planned)
    * Multiple views ability 

License: LGPL
Comment 1 David Grant 2003-09-09 15:14:27 UTC
Created attachment 17366 [details]
Comment 2 David Grant 2003-11-25 13:23:34 UTC
Created attachment 21285 [details]
dia-newcanvas new ebuild

Can someone please verify this ebuild?	I want to know if I did it correctly.
Comment 3 Spider (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-03 12:16:52 UTC
didn't you say License was LGPL?    


use mirror://sourceforge

verify the DOCS line

is this necessary :

src_compile() {
	cd ${S}
	local myconf
	econf || die
	make || die

and if so why?  and why doesn't it use the gnome2 inherited functions?
Comment 4 David Grant 2003-12-03 13:56:32 UTC
Created attachment 21660 [details]

Please test
Comment 5 David Grant 2003-12-03 13:58:21 UTC
Created attachment 21661 [details]

Basically the same thing, but I removed the GCONF redefine statement which I
didn't think was necessary.
Comment 6 Spider (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-04 01:24:47 UTC
better, but which version of LGPL?  
Comment 7 David Grant 2003-12-04 01:27:37 UTC
Sorry, I'm not at home right now,  but I just checked, it's 2.1.  So I guess LGPL-2
Comment 8 Spider (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-04 01:35:28 UTC
LICENSE="LGPL-2.1" Then  (compare to /usr/portage/licenses )
Comment 9 foser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-12-23 09:33:58 UTC
marking this later, the project seems a little dead (last activity early 2003).
Comment 10 David Grant 2004-02-27 09:17:54 UTC
This is required for gael, reopening.
Comment 11 Joe McCann (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2004-12-20 21:41:50 UTC
The site does not offer any files, and the author has stopped working on the project. He only plans to offer older builds at an unspecified date.