282189 – [patch] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1: produces broken binaries with stdcall tailcalls and -foptimize-sibling-calls

Bug 282189 - [patch] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1: produces broken binaries with stdcall tailcalls and -foptimize-sibling-calls

Summary: [patch] sys-devel/gcc-4.4.1: produces broken binaries with stdcall tailcalls ...

Status:	VERIFIED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	[OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware:	x86 Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers

URL:	http://gcc.gnu.org/PR40718
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2009-08-21 11:39 UTC by Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED)
Modified:	2009-12-04 22:23 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
gcc_4.4.1_destroys_tailcall.tar.gz (gcc_4.4.1_destroys_tailcall.tar.gz,1.58 KB, application/octet-stream) 2009-08-21 11:42 UTC, Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED)	Details
pr151030.patch (pr151030.patch,3.10 KB, patch) 2009-08-29 10:31 UTC, Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED)	Details \| Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-08-21 11:39:42 UTC

After upgrading GCC I tried to build my C++ project and noticed crashing produced binaries. After debugging this issue I located the place gcc
emits invalid code. g++-4.3.4 works correctly. I'm not sure what caused regression: vanilla GCC, or gentoo patches, so I post bug here.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Unpack .tat.gz from attach
2. make
3. ./show_the_bug

Actual Results:  
the result is SIGSEGV

Comment 1 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-08-21 11:42:13 UTC

Created attachment 201854 [details]
gcc_4.4.1_destroys_tailcall.tar.gz

Archive contains source sample, makefile and disassembler dumps for gcc-4.3.4 and gcc-4.4.1 of suspicious file.

Comment 2 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-08-21 11:51:30 UTC

Please note I build i386 binaries(-m32) on amd64

Comment 3 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-08-22 12:10:46 UTC

Upstream bug entry: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40718

Comment 4 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester

2009-08-22 18:42:32 UTC

assigning to maintainers.

Comment 5 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-08-29 10:31:41 UTC

Created attachment 202579 [details, diff]
pr151030.patch

Upstream committed fix http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151030 to gcc-4_4 branch.
I got it from svn and stripped ChangeLog entries (they don't apply cleanly).

Fix works for me.

Comment 6 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-09-08 16:55:10 UTC

Should I attach gcc .ebuild or something other to make patch hit portage?

Comment 7 Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-09-10 19:23:18 UTC

nah, we'll get it next time a new patchset is rolled.

Comment 8 Peter Alfredsen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-10-23 05:53:35 UTC

Assuming fixed in 4.4.2

Comment 9 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-12-04 22:23:48 UTC

> Assuming fixed in 4.4.2
Sorry for a delayed response. I confirm - fixed.

Thanks!