Andreas, what is the status of OpenOffice 3.1.0 ? Is it ready for primetime? We're going stable with xulrunner 1.9.1, so judging by dependencies we would need it stable as well.
(In reply to comment #0) > Andreas, what is the status of OpenOffice 3.1.0 ? Is it ready for primetime? > We're going stable with xulrunner 1.9.1, so judging by dependencies we would > need it stable as well. > In my opinion: Very ready for primetime, wanted to propose it for stabilization myself in the next days.
Robin/Java, are these good for stable? dev-java/lucene:2.3 dev-java/lucene-analyzers:2.3
+1 on stabilizing the 2.3 slot of Lucene. If you can safely do SLOT=2.4 instead, that would be even better.
I guess in light of bug #283370 we should target 3.1.1 for stabilization instead
So in the end, 3.1.0-r1 or 3.1.1 ?
I think that 3.1.1 should be the version to stabilize. For now, I updated succesfully to it in one of my systems (that was using 3.0.1 due an upstream bug in 3.0.0 until it was dropped from the tree :-( )
(In reply to comment #5) > So in the end, 3.1.0-r1 or 3.1.1 ? > Yes, definitely 3.1.1, no use in stabilizing a release with multiple security issues (and 3.1.1 is a bugfix release of 3.1.0 anyway, so backporting the fixes is useless IMHO)
Alright then, we'll handle this in the security bug *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 283370 ***
