274119 – sys-fs/archfs fails to build with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

Bug 274119 - sys-fs/archfs fails to build with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

Summary: sys-fs/archfs fails to build with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Markus Ullmann (RETIRED)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:	PMASKED

Depends on:
Blocks:	fortify-source
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2009-06-14 14:46 UTC by Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
Modified:	2010-02-25 19:59 UTC (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Build log (archfs-0.5.1:20090614-115532.log,6.86 KB, text/plain) 2009-06-14 14:46 UTC, Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)	Details
version bump, fix compilation patch, tmpdir patch (archfs-0.5.1_0.5.4_ebuild.patch,807 bytes, patch) 2010-01-04 19:20 UTC, Martin Gysel (bearsh)	Details \| Diff
fix compile patch (fix_compile.patch,520 bytes, patch) 2010-01-04 19:21 UTC, Martin Gysel (bearsh)	Details \| Diff
tmpdir patch, see upstream issue 23 (archfs_tmpdir.patch,692 bytes, patch) 2010-01-04 19:22 UTC, Martin Gysel (bearsh)	Details \| Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-06-14 14:46:00 UTC

Check attached build log.

Comment 1 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-06-14 14:46:17 UTC

Created attachment 194663 [details]
Build log

Comment 2 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2009-11-25 11:46:38 UTC

Markus do you feel like fixing this one or should I last-rite it?

Comment 3 Simon Perry 2009-11-25 12:39:38 UTC

Hi guys,

What does "last-rite" mean again? Does this mean potential removal from the tree?

I can't build this on my system (~x86, hardened kernel).

Happy to help debug as this package as it is *really* useful to me.

Comment 4 Simon Perry 2009-11-25 12:40:50 UTC

* Happy to help debug as this package is *really* useful to me.

Comment 5 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-01-04 14:29:06 UTC

Yes this is on its way out from the tree if somebody can't get it to work with recent GCC and glibc.

Comment 6 Martin Gysel (bearsh) 2010-01-04 19:19:27 UTC

(In reply to comment #5)
> Yes this is on its way out from the tree if somebody can't get it to work with
> recent GCC and glibc.

compiles with attached patch, also added debain TMPDIR patch
version bump, ebuild patch attached
I didn't try if it actually works... maybe dep needs <=rdiff-backup-1.??

Comment 7 Martin Gysel (bearsh) 2010-01-04 19:20:36 UTC

Created attachment 215195 [details, diff]
version bump, fix compilation patch, tmpdir patch

Comment 8 Martin Gysel (bearsh) 2010-01-04 19:21:22 UTC

Created attachment 215196 [details, diff]
fix compile patch

Comment 9 Martin Gysel (bearsh) 2010-01-04 19:22:16 UTC

Created attachment 215198 [details, diff]
tmpdir patch, see upstream issue 23

Comment 10 Martin Gysel (bearsh) 2010-01-04 19:23:20 UTC

(In reply to comment #8)
> Created an attachment (id=215196) [details]
> fix compile patch
> 

see upstream issue 16, http://code.google.com/p/archfs/issues/detail?id=16

Comment 11 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-02-25 19:48:07 UTC

I just bumped to 0.5.6b after a user on IRC showed interest in the package. Is that version working alright for you?

Comment 12 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-02-25 19:49:36 UTC

The upstream bug report says 0.5.5 already fixed this. Please try 0.5.6b and reopen this bug report if it does not solve the issue.

Comment 13 Luca Santarelli 2010-02-25 19:59:19 UTC

Thanks for the on-line Jeroen! I confirm it's working on my x86 box :-)