Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 268785 - dev-perl/Net-RTP - Send and receive RTP packets (RFC3550)
Summary: dev-perl/Net-RTP - Send and receive RTP packets (RFC3550)
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Default Assignee for New Packages
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-RTP/l...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-05-06 06:21 UTC by Michał Kiedrowicz
Modified: 2014-11-28 22:52 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Net-RTP-0.09.ebuild (Net-RTP-0.09.ebuild,429 bytes, text/plain)
2009-05-06 06:21 UTC, Michał Kiedrowicz 		Details
License (UOS,253 bytes, text/plain)
2009-05-06 06:21 UTC, Michał Kiedrowicz 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michał Kiedrowicz 2009-05-06 06:21:09 UTC 
Net::RTP is a perl module able to send and receive RTP packets (RFC3550).
Comment 1 Michał Kiedrowicz 2009-05-06 06:21:30 UTC 
Created attachment 190461 [details]
Net-RTP-0.09.ebuild
Comment 2 Michał Kiedrowicz 2009-05-06 06:21:55 UTC 
Created attachment 190463 [details]
License
Comment 3 Arseny Solokha 2009-10-23 14:23:10 UTC 
0.09 is the last release, and it has been made in mid-2007.
Comment 4 Arseny Solokha 2009-10-23 18:20:35 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> 0.09 is the last release, and it has been made in mid-2007.

Author has no plans on future development, but he is still reachable. It appears that (theoretic) package maintainer can rely on him.
Comment 5 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2014-10-13 22:16:50 UTC 
Is anyone still interested in this? If yes, please say so here and now!
Comment 6 Andreas K. Hüttel archtester gentoo-dev 2014-11-28 22:52:22 UTC 
(In reply to Andreas K. Hüttel from comment #5)
> Is anyone still interested in this? If yes, please say so here and now!

Seems not.