Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 266617 - [gnome-overlay] missing patch for gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1
Summary: [gnome-overlay] missing patch for gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL: http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: gnome2.26
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2009-04-18 05:08 UTC by Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED)
Modified: 2009-04-18 15:49 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-04-18 05:08:19 UTC 
The gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1 ebuild from the Gnome overlay tries to epatch with gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1-volume-keys.patch -- but this patch file does not exist.

This bug was introduced in git commit 31a2a07a60abd6f12657a3c49529a3f8ea917d81



>>> Unpacking gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1.tar.bz2 to /var/tmp/portage/gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1/work
 * Fixing OMF Makefiles ...                                                                                             [ ok ]
 * Running elibtoolize in: gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1
 *   Applying portage-1.5.10.patch ...
 *   Applying sed-1.5.6.patch ...
 * Applying gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1-readd-gst-vol-control-support.patch ...                                        [ ok ]

 * Cannot find $EPATCH_SOURCE!  Value for $EPATCH_SOURCE is:
 * 
 *   /usr/portage/local/layman/gnome/gnome-base/gnome-settings-daemon/files/gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1-volume-keys.patch
 *   ( gnome-settings-daemon-2.26.1-volume-keys.patch )
Comment 1 Nirbheek Chauhan (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-04-18 15:49:42 UTC 
Wasn't this fixed by dang soon after?