When emerging kmymoney2: g++ -DNDEBUG -DNO_DEBUG -O2 -march=pentium3 -mfpmath=sse -msse -mmmx -O2 -pipe -fno-exceptions -fno-check-new -fexceptions -o kmymoney2 kstartuplogo.o kmymoney2.o main.o kstartuplogo.moc.o kmymoney2.moc.o kmymoney2_meta_unload.o -L/usr/lib /usr/lib/libxml2.so /usr/lib/libxml++.a -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/usr/qt/3/lib -L/usr/kde/3.1/lib ./views/libviews.a ./dialogs/libdialogs.a ./widgets/libwidgets.a ./mymoney/storage/libstorage.a ./mymoney/libmymoney.a ./converter/libconverter.a /usr/kde/3.1/lib/libkhtml.so -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2.3 -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2.3/../../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2.3/../../.. -L/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin -L/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/../../../i686-pc-linux-gnu/lib /usr/lib/libjpeg.so /usr/kde/3.1/lib/libkdeprint.so /usr/kde/3.1/lib/libkparts.so /usr/kde/3.1/lib/libkutils.so /usr/kde/3.1/lib/libkio.so /usr/kde/3.1/lib/libkdesu.so -lutil /usr/lib/libfam.so /usr/kde/3.1/lib/libkdeui.so /usr/kde/3.1/lib/libkdecore.so /usr/kde/3.1/lib/libDCOP.so -ldl -lXinerama /usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so /usr/kde/3.1/lib/libkdefx.so -lstdc++ -lXrender /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2.3/libstdc++.so -lc -lgcc_s -lqt-mt -lpng -lz -lm -lXext -lX11 -lSM -lICE -lpthread -lresolv -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/kde/3.1/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2.3 -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/kde/3.1/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2.3 -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/qt/3/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib g++: /usr/lib/libxml++.a: No such file or directory List files from libxmlpp: $ qpkg -l libxmlpp|grep "/usr/lib/" /usr/lib/libxml++-0.1.so.10.0.0 /usr/lib/libxml++-0.1.so.10 -> libxml++-0.1.so.10.0.0 /usr/lib/libxml++-0.1.so -> libxml++-0.1.so.10.0.0 /usr/lib/libxml++-0.1.la /usr/lib/libxml++-0.1.a Kmymoney2 expects the file libxml++.a but as you can see it isn't installed. Verified in versions 0.21 and 0.24.
I would suggest un-commenting the two 'dosym' lines in the libxmlpp ebuild. This should fix the problem. I need to research why they were commented in the first place.
That fixes the problem, but I've got no idea why those lines were commented.
Closing as it now works for reporter.
It works for me after I changed my ebuild. Have you actually changed the ebuild in portage? My 0.24 and 0.25 tree still have the dosym lines commented out!
I didn't change the ebuild, mainly because the reason for why it was commented out in the first place was rather vague. However, I can't reproduce the problem on my end based on the way the ebuild is set up. My thought is that perhaps your system has some cached version of the way the old ebuild used to be and that's what is causing the confusion (since no one else has reported the problem either).
