chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/emu10k1/recmgr.h': Operation not permitted chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/emu10k1/main.c': Operation not permitted chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/emu10k1/efxmgr.h': Operation not permitted chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/emu10k1/midi.c': Operation not permitted chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/emu10k1/recmgr.c': Operation not permitted chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/maestro.h': Operation not permitted chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/dmabuf.c': Operation not permitted chown: changing ownership of `linux-2.6.0-test2/sound/oss/vidc.h': Operation not permitted This of course happens for every file. It doesn't adversely affect anything, but is still annoying to see all these errors run by.
nick: add the --same-owner to the tar cmd in unpack() ?
Actually, I think adding RESTRICT=userpriv would be a better solution to this problem.
this is strange all my 3 systems have userpriv, and i have never seen this (i use development-sources). wanna more info from my systems ?
RESTRICT is never a solution. It's a workaround that isn't a good idea. Is this still an issue? Spanky: Did you test it with same-owner? What made you say tar?
old.
Closing due to old age