Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 254981 - sys-apps/portage-2.1.6.6 doesn't work with genlop -c
Summary: sys-apps/portage-2.1.6.6 doesn't work with genlop -c
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 254972
Alias: None
Product: Portage Development
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Core - External Interaction (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Portage Tools Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-01-14 19:40 UTC by François Valenduc
Modified: 2009-01-14 21:13 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description François Valenduc 2009-01-14 19:40:29 UTC
After having updated portage to the release 2.1.6.6, I notice that genlop -c doesn't work any more. I get the following error when running it:

Use of uninitialized value in subtraction (-) at /usr/bin/genlop line 720.
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/genlop line 721.
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/genlop line 721.

 Currently merging  out of
Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /usr/bin/genlop line 722.

 *

       current merge time: 6 days, 19 hours, 16 minutes and 18 seconds.
       ETA: unknown.


Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Run genlop -c
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
It gives the error mentionned here above

Expected Results:  
A correct result of genlop -c
Comment 1 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2009-01-14 20:27:09 UTC
The reason is that the category is now included in the process output. This prevents the regular expressions from matching on lines 703 and 710 of genlop-0.30.8-r1.
Comment 2 Richard Hartmann 2009-01-14 20:55:12 UTC
Bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=254972 seems to provide a patch for the problem.
Comment 3 Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-01-14 21:13:56 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 254972 ***