Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 248208 - totem will not build without mit-krb5 but does list it as a depend
Summary: totem will not build without mit-krb5 but does list it as a depend
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 235101
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-11-22 15:38 UTC by Harris Landgarten
Modified: 2008-11-23 12:51 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Harris Landgarten 2008-11-22 15:38:07 UTC
After reinstalling all effected packages with -kerberos, I removed mit-krb5 because it was not being used by any installed packages according to paludis. When I tried to rebuild totem it failed when it tried to link to krb5.

I checked on another system that had totem installed:

ldd /usr/bin/totem | grep krb

	libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x00007f3216505000)
	libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x00007f3215eaf000)
	libkrb5support.so.0 => /usr/lib64/libkrb5support.so.0 (0x00007f320e9ac000)


Totem obviously depends on mit-krb5 but does not list it as a DEPEND

The workaround is to reinstall mit-krb5

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Ulrich Müller gentoo-dev 2008-11-22 18:22:49 UTC
Same problem here.
Remerging of dev-libs/totem-pl-parser helped in my case.
Comment 2 Rafał Mużyło 2008-11-22 18:23:59 UTC
In these cases it's best to use revdep-rebuild just to make sure.
Comment 3 Ulrich Müller gentoo-dev 2008-11-22 18:27:26 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> In these cases it's best to use revdep-rebuild just to make sure.

I've done this of course. But for some reason it didn't reveal totem-pl-parser.
Comment 4 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-23 12:51:56 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 235101 ***