Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 245038 - dev-util/dejagnu-1.4.4-r1 testsuite failure
Summary: dev-util/dejagnu-1.4.4-r1 testsuite failure
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Development (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Toolchain Maintainers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-10-31 04:15 UTC by Ryan Hill (RETIRED)
Modified: 2010-09-19 08:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-10-31 04:15:16 UTC
Test Run By portage on Thu Oct 30 22:11:05 2008
Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

                ===  tests ===

Schedule of variations:
    unix

Running target unix
Using /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/dejagnu-1.4.4-r1/work/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/../config/base-config.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Using /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/dejagnu-1.4.4-r1/work/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file.
Running /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/dejagnu-1.4.4-r1/work/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/libdejagnu/tunit.exp ...
FAIL: Pass message
FAIL: Fail message
FAIL: Untested message
FAIL: Unresolved message
Running /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/dejagnu-1.4.4-r1/work/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/runtest.all/libs.exp ...
Running /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/dejagnu-1.4.4-r1/work/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/runtest.all/options.exp ...
Running /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/dejagnu-1.4.4-r1/work/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/runtest.all/stats-sub.exp ...
Running /var/tmp/portage/dev-util/dejagnu-1.4.4-r1/work/dejagnu-1.4.4/testsuite/runtest.all/stats.exp ...

                ===  Summary ===

# of expected passes            59
# of unexpected failures        4
make[5]: *** [check-DEJAGNU] Error 1
Comment 1 Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-10-31 04:25:54 UTC
hrm, looks like it only fails about half of the time.
Comment 2 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-05-10 02:55:46 UTC
It looks like upstream reworked unit.cc which is where these tests are.  Anyone care to try and backport the fixes?
Comment 3 Ryan Hill (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-09-19 08:11:07 UTC
I can't reproduce this anymore.