I noticed that sys-block/aoetools is still at 12, whilst 24, 25 and 27 are still marked as unstable. Is there a reason why these shouldn't be marked as stable? Reproducible: Always
Thanks for the report. Let's see which version the maintainer wants to stable; it might even be 27 since it has been in the tree over a month and there don't seem to be any open bugs against it.
27 going to stable is fine with me. It fixes lots of errors and works well here Adding x86, ppc, and ppc64. Stabilizing on amd64 myself. Arches, please stabilize sys-block/aoetools-27. Thanks!
Excellent news, thanks. aoetools 12 had a problem with not creating /dev/etherd/flush - had to manually mknod it and restart the aoe kernel module, which 24 or 27 solves. However, the aoe kernel module in 2.6.25 is still version 32, whilst the latest from Coraid is 64. Perhaps I should file something?
x86 stable
ppc stable
Just checked the build for aoetools-27.ebuild. Seems ppc64 still isn't marked as stable, and sparc isn't even keyworded.
aoetools on sparc is stable but still marked as unstable. Would some kind soul please stabilise? Thanks
ppc64 done