237670 – Wrong qt4 dependency in cutecom-0.20.0-r1 ebuild

Bug 237670 - Wrong qt4 dependency in cutecom-0.20.0-r1 ebuild

Summary: Wrong qt4 dependency in cutecom-0.20.0-r1 ebuild

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Jurek Bartuszek (RETIRED)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:	217161
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2008-09-14 23:46 UTC by .:deadhead:.
Modified:	2008-09-16 19:57 UTC (History)
CC List:	1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description .:deadhead:. 2008-09-14 23:46:04 UTC

the ebuild it still point to 

DEPEND="x11-libs/qt:4"

instead of something like 

DEPEND="|| (
  ( x11-libs/qt-fooA:4  x11-libs/qt-fooB:4 )
  >=x11-libs/qt-4.2:4
)"

Comment 1 Alin Năstac (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-09-15 19:35:30 UTC

I don't understand what you mean.
What qt-fooA and fooB are supposed to represent? Why do you specify the qt version - does slot 4 versions less than 4.2 don't work in this case?

Comment 2 Peter Volkov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-09-16 15:47:45 UTC

.:deadhead:. you forgot to add blocker. In any way I'll fix this bug in a moment...

Comment 3 Peter Volkov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-09-16 16:16:25 UTC

Thank you for report. Fixed.

Comment 4 .:deadhead:. 2008-09-16 19:57:13 UTC

(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't understand what you mean.
> What qt-fooA and fooB are supposed to represent? Why do you specify the qt
> version - does slot 4 versions less than 4.2 don't work in this case?

I'm sorry for my incomplete bug report. What I wanted to indicate was that in the ebuild it was still specified the dependecy against qt4 as whole package and not against single split components. 

Thanks to pva for the patience and compliments for the fast fix :)