Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 236951 - www-client/opera-9.52: stop warning about files that would be ignored
Summary: www-client/opera-9.52: stop warning about files that would be ignored
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High trivial (vote)
Assignee: Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-09-07 12:17 UTC by Pacho Ramos
Modified: 2010-07-01 15:34 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
opera-9.51-nowarn.patch (opera-9.51-nowarn.patch,746 bytes, patch)
2008-09-07 12:17 UTC, Pacho Ramos
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2008-09-07 12:17:06 UTC
Currently, opera's installer warns about files that would be ignored, this is why following einfo is being used:
einfo "It is safe to ignore warnings about failed checksums"
einfo "and about files that would be ignored ..."

Attached patch removes these warnings allowing the drop of these einfos

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2008-09-07 12:17:25 UTC
Created attachment 164810 [details, diff]
opera-9.51-nowarn.patch
Comment 2 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-09-08 15:14:45 UTC
I would rather not patch install.sh any further. Moreover, it seems upstream would want to fix this at some point:

# TODO: work out what's going on here and replace with something that sets OPERA_ROOTPREFS to where they went !

I'd rather not get rid of the warnings, but make the script more responsive to the situation at hand. If you can fix the TODO in a non Gentoo specific way, then upstream should be a lot happier applying it globally.
Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-07-01 09:05:44 UTC
With 10.60 this code is going away forever.
Comment 4 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2010-07-01 15:34:56 UTC
OK, thanks :-) (I didn't have enough time for taking care of this, sorry)