234654 – net-firewall/ipset-2.3.1.20080612 fails to compile w/ glibc-2.8 (‘UINT_MAX’ undeclared)

Bug 234654 - net-firewall/ipset-2.3.1.20080612 fails to compile w/ glibc-2.8 (‘UINT_MAX’ undeclared)

Summary: net-firewall/ipset-2.3.1.20080612 fails to compile w/ glibc-2.8 (‘UINT_MAX’ u...

Status:	RESOLVED WONTFIX

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High normal
Assignee:	Robin Johnson

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:	glibc-2.8
	Show dependency tree

Reported:	2008-08-13 17:50 UTC by Olivier Huber
Modified:	2008-08-14 00:06 UTC (History)
CC List:	2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
patch proposal (ipset.patch,1.41 KB, patch) 2008-08-13 17:53 UTC, Olivier Huber	Details \| Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Olivier Huber 2008-08-13 17:50:30 UTC

Example :

ipset_ipporthash.c: In function ‘create_parse’:
ipset_ipporthash.c:68: erreur: ‘UINT_MAX’ undeclared (first use in this function)
ipset_ipporthash.c:68: erreur: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
ipset_ipporthash.c:68: erreur: for each function it appears in.)

Upstream has released ipset-2.3.2 which solves this issue : 

Changelog: including limits.h for UINT_MAX is required with glibc-2.8 (pud)

Comment 1 Olivier Huber 2008-08-13 17:53:23 UTC

Created attachment 162834 [details, diff]
patch proposal

This patch has been created with a diff between 2.3.3a and 2.3.1

Comment 2 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-08-13 17:56:33 UTC

Wouldn't it be easier to just bump to 2.3.3a? :)

Comment 3 Olivier Huber 2008-08-13 18:01:50 UTC

(In reply to comment #2)
> Wouldn't it be easier to just bump to 2.3.3a? :)
> 
see bug #233763 :)
I think this would hurt too :)

Comment 4 Robin Johnson archtester

2008-08-14 00:06:38 UTC

go and use 2.3.3a.