234540 – sys-apps/lm_sensors-2.10.7 LDFLAGS ignored QA notice

Bug 234540 - sys-apps/lm_sensors-2.10.7 LDFLAGS ignored QA notice

Summary: sys-apps/lm_sensors-2.10.7 LDFLAGS ignored QA notice

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 209722

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	[OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Mobile Herd (OBSOLETE)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2008-08-12 10:58 UTC by Duncan
Modified:	2008-08-13 11:21 UTC (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Duncan 2008-08-12 10:58:18 UTC

With the LDFLAGS respect detection in portage-2.2 (rc7), I get the following:

 * QA Notice: Files built without respecting LDFLAGS have been detected
 *  Please include this file in your report:
 *  /tmp/portage/sys-apps/lm_sensors-2.10.7/temp/scanelf-ignored-LDFLAGS.log
 * /usr/bin/sensors
 * /usr/sbin/i2cdetect
 * /usr/sbin/i2cdump
 * /usr/sbin/i2cset
 * /usr/sbin/i2cget
 * /usr/sbin/isadump
 * /usr/sbin/isaset
 * /usr/lib64/libsensors.so.3.1.6

Since the package still merged it triggered the cleanup, removing the file I'm supposed to include. =:^S  However, after rerunning ebuild ... install, thus leaving the file there so I can check it, it simply contains the same list as above so little reason to attach it.

I don't believe emerge --info should be needed for this one.  If I'm wrong let me know and I'll attach it.

Comment 1 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2008-08-13 11:21:13 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 209722 ***