Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 228649 - dev-lang/python-2.5.2-r4: Allow sys-libs/db:4.6
Summary: dev-lang/python-2.5.2-r4: Allow sys-libs/db:4.6
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High trivial (vote)
Assignee: Python Gentoo Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 230099 259748 272379 277006 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-06-21 00:13 UTC by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED)
Modified: 2009-07-08 19:48 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
python-2.5.2-berkeleydb-4.6.patch (python-2.5.2-berkeleydb-4.6.patch,541 bytes, patch)
2008-06-21 00:15 UTC, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-21 00:13:34 UTC
dev-lang/python-2.5.2-r4: Allow sys-libs/db:4.6.
Comment 1 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-21 00:15:44 UTC
Created attachment 157837 [details, diff]
python-2.5.2-berkeleydb-4.6.patch

The comment in setup.py is about versions <4.6.21:4.6.
Comment 2 Holger Hoffstätte 2008-06-21 12:36:54 UTC
Does anybody know if the comment removed by the patch regarding db-4.6's lack of stability is still valid? I've been running 4.6.21_p1 and everything builds/links/works fine (daily use with cyrus-imapd). Just curious since the latest bdb release is 4.7.25 and contains the usual set of scary-sounding bugfixes.
Comment 3 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-25 19:32:11 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Does anybody know if the comment removed by the patch regarding db-4.6's
> lack of stability is still valid?

http://svn.python.org/view/python/trunk/setup.py?rev=63742&r1=63718&r2=63742 suggests that Berkeley DB 4.6 is stable only on x86, amd64 and ia64.
Comment 4 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-29 22:02:37 UTC
*** Bug 230099 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-02-21 01:59:33 UTC
*** Bug 259748 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-05-22 14:45:34 UTC
It is fixed in 2.6.*.
Comment 7 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-06-03 18:36:51 UTC
*** Bug 272379 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-06-04 13:16:39 UTC
*** Bug 272379 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-07-08 19:48:21 UTC
*** Bug 277006 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***