Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 216634 - dev-util/gtk-doc-am-1.10 renames gtk-doc.m4, breaking autogen
Summary: dev-util/gtk-doc-am-1.10 renames gtk-doc.m4, breaking autogen
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-04-06 23:32 UTC by Ed Catmur
Modified: 2008-04-08 08:05 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ed Catmur 2008-04-06 23:32:59 UTC
From a svn build of rhythmbox:

/usr/bin/gnome-autogen.sh
checking for autoconf >= 2.53...
  testing autoconf2.50... not found.
  testing autoconf... found 2.61
checking for automake >= 1.7...
  testing automake-1.10... found 1.10.1
checking for libtool >= 1.4.3...
  testing libtoolize... found 1.5.26
checking for glib-gettext >= 2.2.0...
  testing glib-gettextize... found 2.16.2
checking for intltool >= 0.25...
  testing intltoolize... found 0.37.1
checking for pkg-config >= 0.14.0...
  testing pkg-config... found 0.23
checking for gtk-doc >= 1.0...
  testing gtkdocize... found 1.10
checking for gnome-doc-utils >= 0.4.2...
  testing gnome-doc-prepare... found 0.12.2
checking for gnome-common >= 2.3.0...
  testing gnome-doc-common... found 2.20.0
Checking for required M4 macros...
  gtk-doc.m4 not found
***Error***: some autoconf macros required to build rhythmbox
  were not found in your aclocal path, or some forbidden
  macros were found.  Perhaps you need to adjust your
  ACLOCAL_FLAGS?

From /usr/portage/dev-util/gtk-doc-am/gtk-doc-am-1.10.ebuild:
src_compile() {
	mv gtk-doc.m4 gtk-doc-${PV}.m4
}

I guess I understand the reasoning behind moving gtk-doc.m4 to a non-colliding name, but there's lots of packages that refer to it my name only, and as it's not SLOTted there's no real prospect of collision.

Perhaps a symlink would work OK?
Comment 1 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-04-07 09:18:50 UTC
this has been discussed on irc already but I can't remember the outcome.
Comment 2 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev 2008-04-08 00:03:33 UTC
The outcome was that Daniel didn't see a reason to keep the same name and that I believed it must be the same name, and that I can change it to retain name if I want to, but I haven't had time (and frankly forgot about it till now in addition).
So, anyone please feel free to get to it before me and fix it
Comment 3 Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-04-08 08:05:55 UTC
fixed with gtk-doc-am-1.10-r1