Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 20146 - [NEW EBUILD] app-misc/xfe-0.42
Summary: [NEW EBUILD] app-misc/xfe-0.42
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All All
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: EBUILD
Depends on: 20147
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2003-04-28 23:47 UTC by Camille Huot (RETIRED)
Modified: 2003-07-16 15:09 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
xfe-0.42.ebuild (xfe-0.42.ebuild,455 bytes, text/plain)
2003-04-28 23:48 UTC, Camille Huot (RETIRED)
Details
ChangeLog (ChangeLog.,289 bytes, text/plain)
2003-04-28 23:49 UTC, Camille Huot (RETIRED)
Details
digest-xfe-0.42 (digest-xfe-0.42,60 bytes, text/plain)
2003-04-28 23:50 UTC, Camille Huot (RETIRED)
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Camille Huot (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-28 23:47:11 UTC
xfe is a very light and fast file explorer with MS-Explorer style, using libFOX.
xfe-0.42 is the latest version working with current libFOX in portage 
(deprecated).
I'll submit an ebuild for the last libFOX and another for the last version of 
xfe.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Camille Huot (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-28 23:48:49 UTC
Created attachment 11278 [details]
xfe-0.42.ebuild
Comment 2 Camille Huot (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-28 23:49:29 UTC
Created attachment 11280 [details]
ChangeLog
Comment 3 Camille Huot (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-28 23:50:23 UTC
Created attachment 11281 [details]
digest-xfe-0.42
Comment 4 Patrick Kursawe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-15 10:57:35 UTC
Setting this bug to depend on xfe 0.5x (just for the case someone does not find this at the same time)
Comment 5 Don Seiler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-07-16 14:28:22 UTC
x11-misc/xfe-0.54.2 is already in portage.  marking this invalid.
Comment 6 Martin Holzer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-07-16 14:56:09 UTC
invalid is a bad idea

wont fix would be better
Comment 7 Don Seiler (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-07-16 15:09:17 UTC
That's fine.  I wasn't sure and the crew in #gentoo-dev said "invalid" was OK.

Thanks.