Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 200887 - Update How-To for ClamAV/Samba/CUPS
Summary: Update How-To for ClamAV/Samba/CUPS
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: [OLD] Docs on www.gentoo.org
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Other documents (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Xavier Neys (RETIRED)
URL: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/quick-sa...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 200837
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2007-11-30 22:55 UTC by Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED)
Modified: 2007-12-01 11:45 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-30 22:55:38 UTC 
In "Mounting a Windows or Samba share in GNU/Linux" it says
"Note: Don't forget to first emerge samba on the client(s) that will be accessing the shares."

 Alternatively meanwhile net-fs/mount-cifs can be emerged to access shares, so please update the guide.
Comment 1 nm (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-12-01 01:16:55 UTC 
please stabilize mount-cifs on all arches first, then reopen this bug and we'll add it.
Comment 2 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-12-01 10:20:42 UTC 
Reopening and adding bug 200837 as blocker of this here...thus you will notice.
Comment 3 Xavier Neys (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-12-01 11:32:30 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> please stabilize mount-cifs on all arches first,

That would be an interesting policy. Shall we remove all docs that mention to anything that is not stable on *all* arches?

mount-cifs added to doc. Thanks for reporting.
Comment 4 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-12-01 11:45:48 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > please stabilize mount-cifs on all arches first,
> That would be an interesting policy. Shall we remove all docs that mention to
> anything that is not stable on *all* arches?

 What Josh meant is that it should be stable at least on some...this is going on in 200837 and it is done on amd64 and x86.
 
> mount-cifs added to doc. Thanks for reporting.

 No problem.