Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 198068 - texlive 2007 documentation
Summary: texlive 2007 documentation
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: [OLD] Docs on www.gentoo.org
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New Documentation (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: TeX project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-11-04 16:11 UTC by Alexis Ballier
Modified: 2008-01-03 13:13 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
guidexml file (migrationhowto.xml,15.97 KB, text/plain)
2007-11-04 16:11 UTC, Alexis Ballier
Details
update before I forget (migrationhowto.xml,15.88 KB, text/plain)
2007-11-04 18:35 UTC, Alexis Ballier
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2007-11-04 16:11:08 UTC
I've been writing a small guide that explains how we handle texlive, how to migrate to it etc. Now that I've found the time to add the last section (aka common errors), I think it's worth making it an official guide.

However, I have no clue where to put it :/ I'll gladly accept any suggestion.

Reviewing it will also not hurt, be it due to my poor english or that I dont know well guidexml. It should be ok wrt doc team policy, but I might have missed a few rules; if that's the case, please point me them.

Also I'm not an experienced doc writer, so comments are welcome on the organisation of the document & cie.
Comment 1 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2007-11-04 16:11:58 UTC
Created attachment 135158 [details]
guidexml file
Comment 2 Xavier Neys (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-04 16:35:18 UTC
Looks nice to me. A few suggestions:

. drop link="/doc/en/guide.xml", not required, and it's not going to be called guide.xml anyway :)
. file/dir path names go inside <path>, not <c>
. drop the colour coding in <pre>, just use <i> for what the user types, leave the rest as plain text

Destination: if it can't go somewhere under /proj/en/ it'll go under /doc/en/ but we'll need your help to maintain it and you'll need our help to commit it :)
Comment 3 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2007-11-04 18:35:10 UTC
Created attachment 135180 [details]
update before I forget

I cant find any suitable place in proj/en for this, tex doesnt have a project page neither does the old text-markup afaik...
Comment 4 nm (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-12-09 03:57:03 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> I cant find any suitable place in proj/en for this, tex doesnt have a project
> page neither does the old text-markup afaik...

*shrug* so create a project? you can do that, you know. you could ask the X/desktop guys if you wanted it to be a subproject of their stuff. your call.

this is definitely project-specific information, so it should have a home somewhere in /proj/
Comment 5 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2007-12-09 11:51:14 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > I cant find any suitable place in proj/en for this, tex doesnt have a project
> > page neither does the old text-markup afaik...
> 
> *shrug* so create a project?

well... the split happened before my time, and I was too lazy to do the "administrative" stuff of gathering information of who is in, who is not, announcing it, etc to create a project. However, this is probably the best idea.


> you could ask the
> X/desktop guys if you wanted it to be a subproject of their stuff. your call.

it could arguably be put under desktop project also, but I see it at the same level as other languages (python/perl/php/java/etc)

> this is definitely project-specific information, so it should have a home
> somewhere in /proj/

agreed


nevertheless, this does not remove the need of this to be reviewed and proof checked ;) proof checking has been done by several people as far as I know, but english might not be perfect for example.
Comment 6 Martin von Gagern 2007-12-15 10:26:46 UTC
I had a dead symlink /usr/share/texmf/doc which wasn't mentioned in the manual. Maybe you want to include that as well.
Comment 7 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2007-12-15 10:30:19 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> I had a dead symlink /usr/share/texmf/doc which wasn't mentioned in the manual.
> Maybe you want to include that as well.
> 

Do you know what had created it ? what was it pointing to ?
Comment 8 Martin von Gagern 2007-12-15 11:50:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> Do you know what had created it ? what was it pointing to ?

I'm not 100% sure, but I believe it was pointing to ../tetex-${PV} or some subdirectory of this. So I'd say it would have to be some tetex ebuild. Probably due to line 218 of tetex.eclass which says "ln -s ../doc/${PF} doc"
Comment 9 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2007-12-18 07:48:05 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > Do you know what had created it ? what was it pointing to ?
> 
> I'm not 100% sure, but I believe it was pointing to ../tetex-${PV} or some
> subdirectory of this. So I'd say it would have to be some tetex ebuild.
> Probably due to line 218 of tetex.eclass which says "ln -s ../doc/${PF} doc"
> 

well this is done in src_install so I suppose portage should have removed it when unmerging tetex