In postfix-2.4.3 if in virtual_mailbox_limit_maps user has quota 0 (zero) it means "unlimited" like for virtual_mailbox_limit or mailbox_size_limit. In postfix-2.4.5 quota=0 has turned to "Use default virtual_mailbox_limit" thus breaking any existing postfix virtual_mailbox_limit_maps that still assume 0=unlimited. Reproducible: Always Expected Results: Quota setting virtual_mailbox_limit_maps should act similar to mailbox_size_limit. It's possibly is related to changes in VDA patch around line 848: @@ -843,13 +848,13 @@ + } + } + else { -+ /* Invalid limit size (negative), or zero. Set n to 0. */ -+ n = 0; ++ /* Invalid limit size (negative), or zero. Use default virtual_mailbox_limit. */ ++ n = var_virt_mailbox_limit; + } + } + else { -+ /* There is no limit in the maps. Set n to 0. */ -+ n = 0; ++ /* There is no limit in the maps. Use default virtual_mailbox_limit. */ ++ n = var_virt_mailbox_limit; + } + + /*
I'm experiencing the same problem after upgrading to 2.4.5 today
Postfix 2.4 series includes the new VDA-NG, a rewritten and improved version of VDA. See http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=46A5BEBC.5090407%40gmail.com&forum_name=vda-users for an explanation of this particular change. Basically it is a fix for incorrect behavior that VDA displayed in older versions. If you need unlimited quota for a maildir, set it to 0 explicitly for that email. Best regards, CHTEKK.
Ahmmm sorry, misunderstood this one... Zero is actually indeed a logically valid value and is threated as not being one... I'll fix this in VDA. Best regards, CHTEKK.
mail-mta/postfix-2.4.6 should fix this and revert the meaning of quota=0 to "infinite quota". I'd very much like to hear if this indeed fixed your Postfix use cases or if there still are problems... Best regards, CHTEKK.
Ok I just finished all my tests and added mail-mta/postfix-2.4.6-r1 to the tree, which correctly fixes this also for mailbox quotas (and not only maildirs). Best regards, CHTEKK.
