Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 190821 - Switch gnome2.eclass to use emake in gnome2_src_install
Summary: Switch gnome2.eclass to use emake in gnome2_src_install
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 202184
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-08-30 21:41 UTC by Petteri Räty (RETIRED)
Modified: 2007-12-14 06:55 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-08-30 21:41:17 UTC
make DESTDIR=${D} "scrollkeeper_localstate_dir=${D}${sk_tmp_dir} " "$@" install || die "install failed"

should use emake here nowadays
Comment 1 Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-09-04 01:10:00 UTC
Is there some advantage to this?  Or is it just asthetics?  Obviously, it's nicer to have ebuilds use emake, because everyone sees them, but this is an eclass; changing it will cause huge metadata churn for the whole world.  Is there any gain to it?

(I'm not against it; I'm merely prioritizing)
Comment 2 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-09-04 15:05:35 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Is there some advantage to this?  Or is it just asthetics?  Obviously, it's
> nicer to have ebuilds use emake, because everyone sees them, but this is an
> eclass; changing it will cause huge metadata churn for the whole world.  Is
> there any gain to it?
> 
> (I'm not against it; I'm merely prioritizing)
> 

Yes. It makes using MAKEOPTS possible and respects the MAKE variable. It's also  the way to do it told by policy. I regularly change Java eclasses that are used by hundreds of ebuilds... It's only a strain on the servers generating the metadata cache any way.
Comment 3 Saleem Abdulrasool (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-12-13 22:41:24 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 20284 ***
Comment 4 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-12-14 00:16:11 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> 
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 20284 ***
> 

Seems like a typo or something as that bug is about qmail.
Comment 5 Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-12-14 06:55:54 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 202184 ***