Trying to compile gnome (upgrading), with accessibility enabled, this turn on the necessity of gnome-speech to be instaledd but an error occured when compiling java dir content, because it was using as classpath argument -cp while the correct is -classpath. I modified this creating a patch and updating the ebuild for latest version. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.add acessibility and java flag to USE var 2.emerge gnome-speech Actual Results: it will broke during compilation Expected Results: appying the pathc it will compile without problems
Created attachment 127308 [details] gnome-speech-0.4.15.ebuild The ebuild file modified to apply the patch for java
Created attachment 127309 [details, diff] gnome-speech-0.4.15-java-classpath.patch The patch file to fix the Java compiler problem
(In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=127309) [edit] > gnome-speech-0.4.15-java-classpath.patch > > The patch file to fix the Java compiler problem > please submit this patch upstream to gnome-speech maintainers
(In reply to comment #3) > > please submit this patch upstream to gnome-speech maintainers > Forgot to add that post the submission url back here.
*** Bug 199265 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
adding concerned herd.
+*gnome-speech-0.4.25-r1 (05 Jun 2011) + + 05 Jun 2011; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> +gnome-speech-0.4.25-r1.ebuild, + +files/gnome-speech-0.4.25-disable-java.patch: + Drop java support as configure is completly broken and makes that support + automagic (bug #188136), also, looks like nothing in the tree needs that + support and other distributions are already suppling this without java + support for a long time. +
(In reply to comment #7) > +*gnome-speech-0.4.25-r1 (05 Jun 2011) > + > + 05 Jun 2011; Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> +gnome-speech-0.4.25-r1.ebuild, > + +files/gnome-speech-0.4.25-disable-java.patch: > + Drop java support as configure is completly broken and makes that support > + automagic (bug #188136), also, looks like nothing in the tree needs that > + support and other distributions are already suppling this without java > + support for a long time. > + I guess we can drop java from metadata as well.
That is up to java team I think