Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 185206 - netscape-flash fetch errors
Summary: netscape-flash fetch errors
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 185044
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL: http://fpdownload.macromedia.com/get/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-07-13 15:29 UTC by Martin
Modified: 2007-07-13 15:32 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Martin 2007-07-13 15:29:59 UTC
fetch appears to download the complete file

`/usr/portage/distfiles/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz' saved [2608602/2608602]

however the download progress bar stops at 50% and a fetch error is reported

This problem seems isolated to netscape-flash package.
No other packages appear to be failing fetch.
This rules out a general network connection problem.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge netscape-flash
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
Connecting to fpdownload.macromedia.com|122.252.42.70|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 2,608,602 (2.5M) [application/x-gzip]

50% [====================>                     ] 2,608,602    910.64K/s             

23:11:54 (908.09 KB/s) - `/usr/portage/distfiles/install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz' saved [2608602/2608602]

!!! Couldn't download 'install_flash_player_9_linux.tar.gz'. Aborting.

!!! Fetch for /usr/portage/net-www/netscape-flash/netscape-flash-9.0.31.0.ebuild failed, continuing...



!!! Some fetch errors were encountered.  Please see above for details.

   net-www/netscape-flash-9.0.31.0

Expected Results:  
Package should complete fetch and successfully build and install.
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-07-13 15:32:45 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 185044 ***