Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 18159 - gtk-xfce-engine2-cvs-20030323.ebuild ( New Package )
Summary: gtk-xfce-engine2-cvs-20030323.ebuild ( New Package )
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Leonardo Boshell (RETIRED)
Depends on:
Reported: 2003-03-25 13:25 UTC by Minati jean michel
Modified: 2003-04-08 01:59 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

gtk-xfce-engine2-cvs-20030323 , cvs snapshop of the xfce4's gtk engine (gtk-xfce-engine2-cvs-20030323.ebuild,834 bytes, text/plain)
2003-03-25 13:28 UTC, Minati jean michel

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Minati jean michel 2003-03-25 13:25:23 UTC
the file gtk-xfce-engine2-cvs-20030323.ebuild is a ebuild for xfce4 's gtk engine.
xfce4 is a cool window manager avalaible at

As soon as I'll get this ebuild accepted I'll post the missing ebuild for a
fully working xfce4 desktop.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:

my email :
Comment 1 Minati jean michel 2003-03-25 13:28:58 UTC
Created attachment 9798 [details]
gtk-xfce-engine2-cvs-20030323 , cvs snapshop of the xfce4's gtk engine

I didn t find the "cc" fiel told in the doc about submitting ebuild.
I would like to know progress for this ebuild thanks
Comment 2 Minati jean michel 2003-03-25 18:00:32 UTC
you'll need to download the apropriate file on .
I need to find how have some place to mirror the file with a ftp anonymous access.
Comment 3 Leonardo Boshell (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-08 01:59:36 UTC
I'm sorry, but I personally don't support cvs ebuilds in Portage. I suggest that you use cvs ebuilds to test packages privately, or share them with others on your personal website or something. It's just that I think the Portage tree should avoid potentially problematic packages as much as possible. CVS/snapshot ebuilds may be OK if they include critical bug fixes or something like that. Otherwise, making them available in the Portage tree is just asking for trouble.

Thanks a lot for your contribution, though. Maybe you can provide a new ebuild for a stable release of this package soon.