Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 169445 - media-gfx/digikam: multiple forced downgrades
Summary: media-gfx/digikam: multiple forced downgrades
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Ioannis Aslanidis (RETIRED)
Depends on:
Blocks: 169164
  Show dependency tree
Reported: 2007-03-05 12:54 UTC by Ciaran McCreesh
Modified: 2007-03-05 17:37 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ciaran McCreesh 2007-03-05 12:54:47 UTC
media-gfx/digikam :0
  0.7.4-r1 -> nothing on default-linux/alpha/2006.1 (stable)
  0.7.4-r1 -> nothing on default-linux/alpha/2006.1/desktop (stable)
  0.7.4-r1 -> nothing on default-linux/alpha/no-nptl (stable)
  0.7.4-r1 -> nothing on default-linux/alpha/no-nptl/2.4 (stable)
  0.7.4-r1 -> nothing on default-linux/ia64/2006.0 (stable)
  0.7.4-r1 -> nothing on selinux/alpha/2006.1 (stable)

Cause was this:

  03 Mar 2007; Ioannis Aslanidis <>
  -digikam-0.7.4-r1.ebuild, -digikam-0.7.4-r2.ebuild,
  Removed old versions that are below the current stable one.
Comment 1 Ioannis Aslanidis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-05 16:53:37 UTC
Not a KDE bug.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 169164 ***
Comment 2 Ciaran McCreesh 2007-03-05 16:57:45 UTC
Yes it is. You violated policy by that package removal. You broke several archs. The correct way to proceed is to restore the listed version.
Comment 3 Ioannis Aslanidis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-05 17:08:46 UTC
Invalid user.
Comment 4 Stephen Bennett (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-05 17:12:22 UTC
What exactly is that meant to mean? The bug is valid; are you going to fix it or shall I?
Comment 5 Ioannis Aslanidis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-05 17:20:26 UTC
The right way to fix it is to stabilize non-obsolete versions I'm afraid, which is out of my reach for now. I'll restore the old package for now, though. Why isn't ciaranm banned from bugzilla yet, though?
Comment 6 Ioannis Aslanidis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-05 17:31:09 UTC
There you go! Now please stabilize a more recent version.
Comment 7 Stephen Bennett (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-05 17:36:03 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> There you go!


(In reply to comment #5)
> Why isn't ciaranm banned from bugzilla yet, though?

Why would he be?
Comment 8 Ioannis Aslanidis (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-05 17:37:29 UTC
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Why isn't ciaranm banned from bugzilla yet, though?
> Why would he be?
Looks like I missread the mailing lists. Sorry ciaran, and thanks for reporting the issue.