Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 168992 - file package.mask does not exist by default.
Summary: file package.mask does not exist by default.
Status: VERIFIED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Eclasses (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-03-02 11:35 UTC by William Zhou
Modified: 2007-03-02 21:27 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description William Zhou 2007-03-02 11:35:35 UTC
Newly installed system, but I can't find the file but have to create it myself.

I believe it would be convenient to have some files created with some examples in it.


Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-02 11:43:34 UTC
See man portage; no reason to install dummy stuff.
Comment 2 Paul Bredbury 2007-03-02 15:15:44 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> no reason to install dummy stuff.

Yes there is - user-friendliness. It's easier to just edit a file containing some helpful commented examples, rather than check for the existence of the file, create it, check its ownership and permissions, then have to refresh our memory of the exact syntax.
Comment 3 UncleOwen 2007-03-02 21:12:20 UTC
No, a preinstalled file would _decrease_ user friendliness - for everyone who wants to use a directory instead of a file.
Comment 4 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-02 21:18:42 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> It's easier to just edit a file containing
> some helpful commented examples, rather than check for the existence of the
> file, create it, check its ownership and permissions, then have to refresh our
> memory of the exact syntax.

Eh, chances are that if you can't be bothered to read the manpage on the correct syntax, you shouldn't use such stuff at all... ;) The examples are already there.
Comment 5 Paul Bredbury 2007-03-02 21:27:04 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> for everyone who wants to use a directory instead of a file.

It's hardly stopping them. Anyway, the directory should have a *different* name to the file, e.g. package.mask.d