after upgrading emul-linux-x86-baselibs to 10.0-r1, revdep-rebuild says: broken /usr/lib32/libsmbclient.so (requires liblber.so.2 libldap.so.2)
confirmed
I witnessed this too.
Is this an emul-linux-x86-medialibs bug, or an emul-linux-x86-baselibs bug? The liblber.so.2 and libldap.so.2 symlinks aren't created by baselibs-10.0-r1; it has: /usr/lib32/liblber.so -> liblber-2.3.so.0.2.18 /usr/lib32/liblber-2.3.so.0 -> liblber-2.3.so.0.2.18 /usr/lib32/libldap.so -> libldap-2.3.so.0.2.18 /usr/lib32/libldap-2.3.so.0 -> libldap-2.3.so.0.2.18 If the .so.2 links should be there, it's a baselibs bug; if not, it's an medialibs bug.
> Is this an emul-linux-x86-medialibs bug, or an emul-linux-x86-baselibs bug? medialibs bug. samba shouldn't even be in there. I have a fixed version in the queue, but that one requires mplayer-bin to be rebuilt too, which I'm currently working on.
10.0 fixes this
(In reply to comment #5) > 10.0 fixes this > It may fix it but it is masked plus it breaks mplayer-bin due to missing libizo.so.1.
*** Bug 168306 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
(In reply to comment #5) > 10.0 fixes this > app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-10.1 or app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-10.1-r1 doesn't fix it.
> app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-10.1 or > app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-baselibs-10.1-r1 doesn't fix it. emul-linux-x86-*medialibs*-10.0 does, though.